Karuk Tribe et al v. Stelle et al

Filing 47

ORDER RE: DEFERRED PORTION OF STIPULATION. The Stipulation is approved as to the format of the chambers copy of the administrative record, on condition that a paper copy of any document cited in a party's briefing be provided by that party, absent an order from the Court allowing such party to provide an excerpted paper copy in lieu thereof. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 19, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 KARUK TRIBE, et al., Plaintiffs, 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Case No. 16-cv-01079-MMC ORDER RE: DEFFERED PORTION OF STIPULATION v. WILLIAM STELLE, et al., Defendants. 14 15 Before the Court is the parties’ “Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Allowing Filing of 16 Administrative Record on Computer Disk or Drive” (hereinafter, “Stipulation”), filed April 17 14, 2016. On April 15, 2016, the Court approved the Stipulation to the extent it sought 18 permission to file the administrative record on computer disk or hard drive, deferred ruling 19 on the Stipulation to the extent it sought permission to provide the Court with chambers 20 copies of the administrative record in said electronic, rather than paper, format, and 21 directed the federal defendants to file a statement as to the number of pages comprising 22 the administrative record. 23 The Court having received that additional information, the Stipulation is hereby 24 APPROVED as to the format of the chambers copy of the administrative record, on 25 condition that a paper copy of any document cited in a party’s briefing be provided by that 26 party, absent an order from the Court allowing such party to provide an excerpted paper 27 28 1 2 3 copy in lieu thereof.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 19, 2016 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 At the telephonic conference held today’s date, defendants offered to provide the Court with paper copies of the Record of Decision and the Final Environmental Impact Statement. Accordingly, additional paper copies of those documents need not be submitted by any party. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?