Karuk Tribe et al v. Stelle et al

Filing 69

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 19, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2016)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

KARUK TRIBE, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 16-cv-01079-MMC

v.
WILLIAM STELLE, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
TO COMPLAINT
Re: Dkt. No. 68

12
13

Before the Court is federal defendants’ Motion for Extension of Time, filed May 19,

14

2016, by which motion federal defendants seek a thirty-day extension of their May 20,

15

2016 deadline to respond to plaintiffs’ complaint. The motion, however, is not filed in

16

accordance with the Civil Local Rules of this district, which (1) require a supporting

17

declaration setting forth, inter alia, “the efforts the party has made to obtain a stipulation

18

to the time change,” and (2) provide for opposition to be filed within four days of the date

19

the motion is filed. See Civil L.R. 6-3(a)(2), (b).

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Accordingly, the motion is hereby DENIED without prejudice to federal defendants’
filing a motion or stipulation that complies with the Civil Local Rules.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 19, 2016
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge