Karuk Tribe et al v. Stelle et al

Filing 71

ORDER APPROVING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PARTIES' STIPULATION RE: CASE MANAGEMENT; DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 20, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KARUK TRIBE, et al., Plaintiffs, 8 v. 9 10 WILLIAM STELLE, et al., Defendants. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 16-cv-01079-MMC ORDER APPROVING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PARTIES' STIPULATION RE: CASE MANAGEMENT; DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES Re: Dkt. No. 70 12 13 Before the Court is the parties’ “Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re: Case 14 Management,” filed May 20, 2016, by which the parties seek an order (1) vacating all 15 deadlines in the instant case, including federal defendants’ deadline to file a response to 16 plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, (2) setting a June 15, 2016 deadline for federal 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 defendants to file the Administrative Record of the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”), (3) vacating the Initial Case Management Conference currently set for June 3, 2016, and (4) requiring the parties to file a case management statement fourteen days after the Ninth Circuit has issued its mandate in Karuk Tribe v. Stelle, No. 16-15818 (9th Cir. filed May 4, 2016). Having read and considered the Stipulation, the Court rules as follows. 1. To the extent the parties seek an order vacating all deadlines currently set in the above-titled action, the Stipulation is hereby APPROVED. 2. To the extent the parties seek an order setting a June 15, 2016 deadline for federal defendants to file the NMFS Administrative Record, the Stipulation is hereby APPROVED. 1 2 3 3. To the extent the parties seek an order vacating the June 3, 2016 Case Management Conference, the Stipulation is hereby APPROVED. 4. To the extent the parties seek an order requiring the parties to file a case 4 management statement fourteen days after the Ninth Circuit has issued its mandate in 5 Karuk Tribe v. Stelle, No. 16-15818 (9th Cir. filed May 4, 2016), the Stipulation is hereby 6 DENIED, and, in lieu thereof, the parties are hereby DIRECTED to file, no later than 7 seven calendar days after the Ninth Circuit has issued said mandate, a stipulation setting 8 forth a mutually agreeable date for the Initial Case Management Conference. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 20, 2016 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?