Karuk Tribe et al v. Stelle et al

Filing 92

ORDER DENYING PARTIES' STIPULATED REQUEST RE: TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 05/05/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Tom Wheeler, CA Bar #304191
Environmental Protection Information Center
145 G Street #A
Arcata, California 95521
[e-mail]
Ph: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Counsel for Plaintiff Environmental Protection Information Center
Susan Jane M. Brown, pro hac vice
Western Environmental Law Center
4107 N.E. Couch St.
Portland, Oregon 97232
[e-mail]
Ph: [phone]
Peter M.K. Frost, pro hac vice
Western Environmental Law Center
1216 Lincoln Street
Eugene, Oregon 97401
[e-mail]
Ph: [phone]
Counsel for Plaintiffs Karuk Tribe, Klamath Riverkeeper, Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center
and Center for Biological Diversity

17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18
19
20
21
22
23
24

KARUK TRIBE, et. al.
Plaintiffs,
vs.
PATRICIA GRANTHAM, et al.
Defendants,

25
26
27
28

and
SISKIYOU COUNTY, et al.
Defendants-Intervenors.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:16-cv-01079-MMC
DENYING PARTIES' STIPULATED REQUEST
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PARTIES’
STIPULATION RE: TELEPHONIC
APPEARANCE

Denying Parties' Stipulated Request
[Proposed] Order re: Parties’ Stip. re: Telephonic Appearance, No. 3:16-cv-01079-MMC

1
2
3
4
5
6

The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulation to allow them to appear telephonically at
any oral argument on Plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint. The Court, however, does not
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED. conduct such hearings
telephonically. Accordingly, the parties' request is hereby denied. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: May __, 2017.
5

________________________________________
Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Denying Parties' Stipulated Request
[Proposed] Order re: Parties’ Stip. re: Telephonic Appearance, No. 3:16-cv-01079-MMC