Karuk Tribe et al v. Stelle et al

Filing 94

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO FILE SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL AND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Plaintiffs shall file, no later than May 23, 2017, a Second Amended Complaint in accordance with this order. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 05/15/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KARUK TRIBE, et al., Plaintiffs, 8 9 v. WILLIAM STELLE, et al., 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 Defendants. Case No. 16-cv-01079-MMC ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO FILE SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL AND AMENDED COMPLAINT Re: Dkt. No. 82 12 13 Before the Court is plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a Second Supplemental and 14 Amended Complaint, filed April 3, 2017. The matter came on regularly for hearing on 15 May 12, 2017. Peter M.K. Frost of the Western Environmental Law Center appeared on 16 behalf of plaintiffs. S. Derek Shugert of the U.S. Department of Justice appeared on 17 behalf of defendants. Julie A. Weis of Haglund Kelley LLP appeared on behalf of 18 defendant-intervenors. The Court, having considered the parties’ respective written 19 submissions and the arguments of counsel at the hearing, rules as follows. 20 To the extent plaintiffs seek to supplement their pleading, specifically, to add a 21 claim for violation of the National Environmental Policy Act, the motion is, for the reasons 22 stated by the Court at the hearing, hereby DENIED without prejudice. 23 In all other respects, the motion is hereby GRANTED. 24 Plaintiffs shall file, no later than May 23, 2017, a Second Amended Complaint in 25 26 27 28 accordance therewith. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 15, 2017 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?