Cabiness v. Educational Financial Services

Filing 92

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 91 STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order Selecting Private ADR by Educational Financial Solutions, LLC filed by Educational Financial Solutions, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 11, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2017)

Download PDF
Reset Form UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT   NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA  Winifred Cabiness CASE No C 16-cv-01109-JST Plaintiff(s) v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Educational Financial Solutions, LLC Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:    Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)    Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)  s  Private ADR (specify process and provider) The parties have agreed to private mediation with the Honorable Peter D. Lichtman on June 5, 2017 in Los Angeles, CA. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:   Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5.   the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. )    other requested deadline:  June 30, 2017 s Date: April 6, 2017 Date: April 6, 2017   /s/ Bryan Kemnitzer Attorney for Plaintiff  /s/ Jame Vorhis Attorney for Defendant   IT IS SO ORDERED X  IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: Date: April 11, 2017 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE  Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.” Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017 Print Form

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?