Pratt v. Hedricks et al

Filing 11

ORDER REOPENING CASE. Signed by Judge James Donato on 8/30/16. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RYANT TRIMALE PRATT, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 16-cv-01129-JD ORDER REOPENING CASE v. B. HEDRICKS, et al., Defendants. 12 13 This pro se civil rights action was dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to 14 pay the filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has now filed a 15 motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Order of Dismissal (Docket No. 7) is VACATED and 16 this case is REOPENED. The Court will review the complaint in a separate order. 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 30, 2016 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JAMES DONATO United States District Judge 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 RYANT TRIMALE PRATT, Case No. 16-cv-01129-JD Plaintiff, 5 v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 6 7 B. HEDRICKS, et al., Defendants. 8 9 10 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 That on August 30, 2016, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 16 17 18 Ryant Trimale Pratt ID: H-06191 Salinas Valley State Prison P.O. Box 1050 Soledad, CA 93960 19 20 21 Dated: August 30, 2016 22 23 Susan Y. Soong Clerk, United States District Court 24 25 26 27 By:________________________ LISA R. CLARK, Deputy Clerk to the Honorable JAMES DONATO 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?