Buster v. Mechanics Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan et al

Filing 184

ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL #183 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF SPECIAL MASTER. Signed by Judge Alsup on 1/23/2018. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 STEVEN K. BUSTER, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 No. C 16-01146 WHA v. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF MECHANICS BANK; MECHANICS BANK SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN; and MECHANICS BANK, a California Corporation, ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF SPECIAL MASTER 16 Defendants. 17 / 18 On December 29, 2017, special master Laura Hurtado filed a report and 19 recommendation that plaintiff be awarded $844,795.60 in attorney’s fees and that the special 20 master’s fees in the amount of $8,760 be split 25 percent ($2,190) to 75 percent ($6,570) 21 between plaintiff and defendants, respectively (Dkt. No. 183). Any objections to or motions 22 regarding the report and recommendation were due by January 12, 2018. As of the date of this 23 order, neither side has filed any such objection or motion. The Court has reviewed and hereby 24 ADOPTS IN FULL the special master’s report and recommendation. 25 To facilitate timely payment of the special master’s fees, defendants shall promptly 26 transmit, within FOURTEEN CALENDAR DAYS of this order, the entire amount of said fees 27 28 1 ($8,760) to the special master and the award of attorney’s fees, less plaintiff’s 25 percent of the 2 special master’s fees ($842,605.60), to plaintiff. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: January 23, 2018. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?