Buster v. Mechanics Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan et al
Filing
184
ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL #183 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF SPECIAL MASTER. Signed by Judge Alsup on 1/23/2018. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
STEVEN K. BUSTER,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
No. C 16-01146 WHA
v.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF MECHANICS
BANK; MECHANICS BANK
SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE
RETIREMENT PLAN; and MECHANICS
BANK, a California Corporation,
ORDER ADOPTING IN
FULL REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF
SPECIAL MASTER
16
Defendants.
17
/
18
On December 29, 2017, special master Laura Hurtado filed a report and
19
recommendation that plaintiff be awarded $844,795.60 in attorney’s fees and that the special
20
master’s fees in the amount of $8,760 be split 25 percent ($2,190) to 75 percent ($6,570)
21
between plaintiff and defendants, respectively (Dkt. No. 183). Any objections to or motions
22
regarding the report and recommendation were due by January 12, 2018. As of the date of this
23
order, neither side has filed any such objection or motion. The Court has reviewed and hereby
24
ADOPTS IN FULL
the special master’s report and recommendation.
25
To facilitate timely payment of the special master’s fees, defendants shall promptly
26
transmit, within FOURTEEN CALENDAR DAYS of this order, the entire amount of said fees
27
28
1
($8,760) to the special master and the award of attorney’s fees, less plaintiff’s 25 percent of the
2
special master’s fees ($842,605.60), to plaintiff.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: January 23, 2018.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?