Buster v. Mechanics Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan et al
REQUEST FOR RESPONSE RE AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 5/27/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2016)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
STEVEN K BUSTER,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 16-01146 WHA
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
MECHANICS BANK, MECHANICS
BANK SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE
RETIREMENT PLAN, MECHANICS
BANK, a California Corporation,
REQUEST FOR RESPONSE RE
Plaintiff’s response to defendants’ motion to dismiss was due today. In lieu of a
response, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. By JUNE 1 AT NOON, defendants shall please
state whether their motion to dismiss should be denied as moot in light of the amended
complaint or if they would prefer to continue with the pending motion as if directed to the
amended complaint. If defendants elect to continue with the pending motion, a new briefing
schedule will be set, though the July 14 hearing date will remain in place.
May 27, 2016.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?