Buster v. Mechanics Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan et al
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT by Hon. William Alsup finding as moot 23 Motion to Dismiss.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2016)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
STEVEN K. BUSTER,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 16-01146 WHA
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
MECHANICS BANK, MECHANICS
BANK SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE
RETIREMENT PLAN, MECHANICS
BANK, a California Corporation,
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS AS MOOT
Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. Defendants stated their pending motion to dismiss
should be denied as moot without prejudice to a renewed motion directed at the amended
pleadings. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is hereby DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
June 2, 2016.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?