Buster v. Mechanics Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan et al

Filing 35

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT by Hon. William Alsup finding as moot 23 Motion to Dismiss.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 STEVEN K. BUSTER, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. C 16-01146 WHA v. 16 COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF MECHANICS BANK, MECHANICS BANK SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN, MECHANICS BANK, a California Corporation, 17 Defendants. 14 15 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT / 18 Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. Defendants stated their pending motion to dismiss 19 20 should be denied as moot without prejudice to a renewed motion directed at the amended 21 pleadings. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is hereby DENIED AS MOOT. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: June 2, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?