Buster v. Mechanics Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan et al

Filing 35

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT by Hon. William Alsup finding as moot #23 Motion to Dismiss.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
STEVEN K. BUSTER,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Plaintiff,

12
13

No. C 16-01146 WHA

v.

16

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
MECHANICS BANK, MECHANICS
BANK SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE
RETIREMENT PLAN, MECHANICS
BANK, a California Corporation,

17

Defendants.

14
15

ORDER DENYING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS AS MOOT

/

18
Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. Defendants stated their pending motion to dismiss

19
20

should be denied as moot without prejudice to a renewed motion directed at the amended

21

pleadings. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is hereby DENIED AS MOOT.

22
IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated:

June 2, 2016.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE