Buster v. Mechanics Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan et al

Filing 46

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO CONDUCT COURT-ORDERED DEPOSITIONS OF PLAINTIFF STEVEN BUSTER AND DIANNE FELTON OF MECHANICS BANK by Hon. William Alsup granting #45 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Trucker  Huss A Professional Corporation One Embarcadero Center, 12th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 10 11 12 13 R. Bradford Huss (SBN 71303) Dylan D. Rudolph (SBN 278707) TRUCKER  HUSS A Professional Corporation One Embarcadero Center, 12th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 788-3111 Facsimile: (415) 421-2017 E-mail: bhuss@truckerhuss.com drudolph@truckerhuss.com Joseph C. Faucher (SBN 137353) TRUCKER  HUSS A Professional Corporation 633 West 5th Street, 26th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 537-1016 Facsimile: (213) 537-1020 E-mail: jfaucher@truckerhuss.com Attorneys for Defendants COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF MECHANICS BANK; MECHANICS BANK SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN, MECHANICS BANK, a California Corporation 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 STEVEN K. BUSTER, 18 Plaintiff, 19 20 21 22 23 vs. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF MECHANICS BANK; MECHANICS BANK SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN, MECHANICS BANK, a California Corporation, Case No.: 3:16-cv-01146-WHA STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO CONDUCT COURT-ORDERED DEPOSITIONS OF PLAINTIFF STEVEN BUSTER AND DIANNE FELTON OF MECHANICS BANK [Filed concurrently with Declaration of Joseph C. Faucher pursuant to L-R 6-2(a)] 24 Defendants. 25 26 27 28 Order re: STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO CONDUCT THE COURT-ORDERED DEPOSITIONS OF PLAINTIFF STEVEN BUSTER AND DIANNE FELTON; Case No. 3:16-cv-01146-WHA -1- 1 Defendants COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF 2 MECHANICS BANK; MECHANICS BANK SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT 3 PLAN and MECHANICS BANK (collectively, “Defendants”) and Plaintiff Steven K. Buster 4 (“Plaintiff”) (together hereafter the “Parties”) hereby stipulate and agree, by and through their 5 respective counsel, to extend the time for the Parties to conduct the court-ordered depositions of 6 Plaintiff Steven Buster and Dianne Felton of Mechanics Bank, to now take place on July 6, 2016. 7 WHEREAS, on June 9, 2016, the Court ordered that one-hour depositions of Plaintiff 8 Steven Buster and Dianne Felton shall be taken on or before June 30, 2016, and specifically to take 9 place on June 27, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. at the offices of Plaintiff’s counsel, Louderback Law Group, Trucker  Huss A Professional Corporation One Embarcadero Center, 12th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 10 located at 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2970, San Francisco, California 94104. (Docket #41.) 11 WHEREAS, good cause exists to extend the time to take the depositions of Plaintiff Steven 12 Buster and Dianne Felton by reason of the fact that Dianne Felton is largely unavailable during the 13 entire month of June. To accommodate their respective schedules, and at the same time proceed 14 with the depositions at the earliest possible date, the Parties have agreed to proceed with the one- 15 hour depositions of Plaintiff Steven Buster and Dianne Felton on July 6, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. at the 16 offices of Plaintiff’s counsel, Louderback Law Group, located at 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2970, 17 San Francisco, California 94104. 18 The Parties have not requested any prior extensions of time to conduct the depositions of 19 Plaintiff Steven Buster or Dianne Felton. Prior time modifications in this case, whether by 20 stipulation or Court order, include: (1) Defendants previously obtained a thirty (30) day extension of 21 time, from April 6, 2016 to May 6, 2016, to respond to the original Complaint in this matter, by 22 stipulation; (2) the Court issued an Order Extending Deadlines for Response and Reply Papers re 23 Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss on May 18, 2016 (Docket #28); and (3) the Court issued an Order 24 Extending Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint on June 9, 2016 25 (Docket #39). The proposed order extending the time to conduct said depositions to July 6, 2016 26 will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order in this matter. This 27 Stipulation is made and entered into pursuant to Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2(a). 28 Order re: STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO CONDUCT THE COURT-ORDERED DEPOSITIONS OF PLAINTIFF STEVEN BUSTER AND DIANNE FELTON; Case No. 3:16-cv-01146-WHA -2- 1 THE PARTIES THEREFORE AGREE AND STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 2 The depositions of Plaintiff Steven K. Buster and Dianne Felton of Mechanics Bank will 3 now take place on July 6, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. at the offices of Plaintiff’s counsel, Louderback Law 4 Group, located at 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2970, San Francisco, California 94104. 5 6 DATED: June 16, 2016 TRUCKER  HUSS 7 By: /s/Joseph C. Faucher R. Bradford Huss Joseph C. Faucher Dylan D. Rudolph Attorneys for Defendants COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF MECHANICS BANK; MECHANICS BANK SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN, MECHANICS BANK, a California Corporation 8 9 Trucker  Huss A Professional Corporation One Embarcadero Center, 12th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 10 11 12 13 14 DATED: June 16, 2016 LOUDERBACK LAW GROUP 15 By: /s/Charles M. Louderback Charles M. Louderback Attorney for Plaintiff STEVEN K. BUSTER 16 17 18 19 20 I attest that I have obtained Mr. Louderback’s concurrence in the filing of this document. DATED: June 16, 2016 /s/Joseph C. Faucher Joseph C. Faucher 21 22 23 24 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. June 20 DATED: _____________, 2016 25 HON. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 26 27 28 Order re: STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO CONDUCT THE COURT-ORDERED DEPOSITIONS OF PLAINTIFF STEVEN BUSTER AND DIANNE FELTON; Case No. 3:16-cv-01146-WHA -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?