Tammi Fuqua v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Filing 77

Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion for Summary Judgment. A detailed order explaining the Court's reasoning will follow. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
TAMMI FUQUA,

7

Case No. 16-cv-01193-JCS

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

9
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.,

10

Re: Dkt. No. 33

Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment (dkt. 33) is

13

GRANTED as to Plaintiff Tammi Fuqua’s fourth and eighth claims, for disability discrimination

14

based on a theory of disparate impact and for violation of section 201 of the California Labor

15

Code, and as to her prayer for punitive damages. The motion is otherwise DENIED.1 A detailed

16

order explaining the Court’s reasoning will follow.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18

Dated: September 26, 2017
______________________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
Chief Magistrate Judge

19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
1

28

The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned magistrate judge for all
purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).