Carter et al v. XPO Logistics, Inc.

Filing 152

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The six opt-in plaintiffs at issue may discharge this Order to Show Cause by serving the outstanding discovery on defendant on or before 3/23/2018. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 02/22/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2018)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 RON CARTER, et al., 4 Plaintiffs, 5 XPO LOGISTICS, INC, 7 Defendant. 8 Defendant has moved to dismiss the claims of six FLSA opt-in plaintiffs, given those 9 plaintiffs’ failure to respond to discovery. Dkt. No. 143.1 These six non-responsive opt-in plaintiffs are Ordered to Show Cause why their FLSA 11 United States District Court Northern District of California ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. 6 10 Case No. 16-cv-01231-WHO 12 claims should not be dismissed with prejudice and their state law claims dismissed without 13 prejudice under Rule 37 for failure to participate in discovery. 14 The six opt-in plaintiffs at issue may discharge this OSC by serving the outstanding 15 discovery on defendant on or before March 23, 2018. If any of these opt-in plaintiffs is unable to 16 respond to the discovery but believes good cause exists to excuse that failure and to maintain their 17 FLSA claims, plaintiffs’ counsel shall file a declaration from that plaintiff explaining his specific 18 good cause. 19 If any of the six non-responsive opt-in plaintiffs fails to serve their discovery on defendant 20 by March 23, 2018 and fails to establish good cause excusing that failure, their FLSA claims shall 21 be dismissed with prejudice and their state law claims dismissed without prejudice. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 22, 2018 24 25 William H. Orrick United States District Judge 26 27 28 1 The six opt-in plaintiffs at issue are: (i) Martin Arrambide, (ii) Alejandro Ascencio, (iii) Daniel Douglas, (iv) Edgar Espinal, (v) Henry Racinos, and (vi) Wayne Vivolo,

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?