Carter et al v. XPO Logistics, Inc.
Filing
53
ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES' STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CLASS CERTIFICATION AND ORDER TO FACILITATE COLLECTIVE ACTION NOTICE - Reset Deadlines as to 49 MOTION to Certify Class. Response due by 8/31/2016. Reply due by 9/14/2016. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/23/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2016)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RON CARTER, JUAN ESTRADA, JERRY
GREEN, BURL MALMGREN, BILL
McDONALD, and JOEL MORALES, on
behalf of themselves and others similarly
situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
XPO LAST MILE, INC. and DOES 1 through
10, inclusive,
Defendant.
11
Case No. 3:16-cv-01231-WHO
ORDER GRANTING THE
PARTIES’ STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
ORDER CHANGING DEFENDANT’S
DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
CONDITIONAL CLASS CERTIFICATION
AND ORDER TO FACILITATE
COLLECTIVE ACTION NOTICE
Amended Complaint Filed: June 9, 2016
Trial Date:
Feb. 12, 2018
Judge:
Hon. William H. Orrick
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Upon consideration of the Parties’ Stipulated Request for Order Changing Defendant’s
Deadline to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Class Certification and Order to
Facilitate Collective Action Notice, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that:
The Parties’ Stipulated Request is GRANTED. Defendant will have up to and including
August 31, 2016 to file its response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Class Certification and
Order to Facilitate Collective Action Notice. Plaintiffs will have up to and including September
14, 2016 to file their reply.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
August 23, 2016
DATED: ____________________
25
26
The Honorable William H. Orrick
United States District Judge
27
28
25898935.2
1
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST
Case No. 3:16-cv-01231-WHO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?