Westport Insurance Corporation v. California Casualty Management Co.
Filing
46
ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 40 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings. If plaintiff wishes to file a second reply brief addressing any new arguments raised in defendant's second opposition brief, it may do so by June 1, 2016. Case Management Conference rescheduled for 6/22/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 6/15/2016. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/26/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
WESTPORT INSURANCE
CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
11
v.
Case No. 16-cv-01246-WHO
ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CALIFORNIA CASUALTY
MANAGEMENT CO.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendant.
12
The motion for judgment on the pleadings set for hearing on June 22, 2016 was already
13
fully briefed when this case was transferred from the United States District Court for the District
14
of Kansas to this district. On May 25, 2016, defendant filed a second brief in opposition to the
15
motion. See Dkt. No. 45 (second opposition brief); Dkt No. 20 (first opposition brief). If plaintiff
16
wishes to file a second reply brief addressing any new arguments raised in defendant’s second
17
opposition brief, it may do so by June 1, 2016. The second reply brief, if any, shall not repeat or
18
readdress arguments made during the parties’ first round of briefing.
19
The case management conference set for June 21, 2016 is VACATED and RESET to June
20
22, 2016, immediately following the motion hearing.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
Dated: May 26, 2016
23
24
25
26
27
28
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?