Westport Insurance Corporation v. California Casualty Management Co.

Filing 46

ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 40 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings. If plaintiff wishes to file a second reply brief addressing any new arguments raised in defendant's second opposition brief, it may do so by June 1, 2016. Case Management Conference rescheduled for 6/22/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 6/15/2016. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/26/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 WESTPORT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 11 v. Case No. 16-cv-01246-WHO ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CALIFORNIA CASUALTY MANAGEMENT CO., United States District Court Northern District of California Defendant. 12 The motion for judgment on the pleadings set for hearing on June 22, 2016 was already 13 fully briefed when this case was transferred from the United States District Court for the District 14 of Kansas to this district. On May 25, 2016, defendant filed a second brief in opposition to the 15 motion. See Dkt. No. 45 (second opposition brief); Dkt No. 20 (first opposition brief). If plaintiff 16 wishes to file a second reply brief addressing any new arguments raised in defendant’s second 17 opposition brief, it may do so by June 1, 2016. The second reply brief, if any, shall not repeat or 18 readdress arguments made during the parties’ first round of briefing. 19 The case management conference set for June 21, 2016 is VACATED and RESET to June 20 22, 2016, immediately following the motion hearing. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: May 26, 2016 23 24 25 26 27 28 ______________________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?