Doe No. 59 v. Santa Rosa City Schools

Filing 71

ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 06/12/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

JANE DOE NO. 59,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 3:16-cv-01256-WHO
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
DISMISSAL

v.
SANTA ROSA CITY SCHOOLS, et al.,
Defendants.

12
13

On June 12, 2017, the Court was notified that the parties have settled and that a conditional

14

dismissal is appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH

15

PREJUDICE and the scheduled trial and pre-trial dates are VACATED. It is further ordered that

16

if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within ninety (90) days

17

from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this

18

cause shall be restored to the calendar for further proceedings.

19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 12, 2017

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

William H. Orrick
United States District Judge