Doe No. 59 v. Santa Rosa City Schools

Filing 71

ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 06/12/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JANE DOE NO. 59, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 3:16-cv-01256-WHO ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL v. SANTA ROSA CITY SCHOOLS, et al., Defendants. 12 13 On June 12, 2017, the Court was notified that the parties have settled and that a conditional 14 dismissal is appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH 15 PREJUDICE and the scheduled trial and pre-trial dates are VACATED. It is further ordered that 16 if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within ninety (90) days 17 from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this 18 cause shall be restored to the calendar for further proceedings. 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 12, 2017 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 William H. Orrick United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?