Walintukan v. SBE Entertainment Group, LLC et al

Filing 41

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND re 40 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Deric Walintukan. Plaintiff's motion to amend due 11/6/2016. Defendant's opposition due 12/7/2016. Pla intiff's reply to Defendant's opposition due 12/21/2016. Motion Hearing set for 1/19/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 20, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DERIC WALINTUKAN, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 16-cv-01311-JST ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND v. SBE ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LLC, et al., Re: ECF No. 40 Defendants. 12 13 14 On October 19, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation and proposed order to set a briefing schedule on Plaintiff’s motion to amend. ECF No. 40. The Court will adopt the parties’ 15 stipulation, except that the hearing on Plaintiff’s motion to amend shall take place on January 19, 16 17 2017, at 2:00 p.m. The briefing schedule is hereby set as follows: (1) Plaintiff’s motion to amend 18 shall be filed by November 9, 2016; (2) Defendant’s opposition shall be filed by December 7, 19 2016; (3) Plaintiff’s reply to Defendant’s opposition shall be filed by December 21, 2016. 20 21 The currently set deadline for the filing of a motion for class certification is vacated, to be 22 set during a further case management conference held within thirty days of the Court’s ruling on 23 the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 20, 2016 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?