Smith-Anderson Enterprises, Inc. v. Boston East Tyngsboro Holdings, LLC et al
Filing
34
ORDER GRANTING 33 Stipulation Extend Deadline to Respond filed by Smith-Anderson Enterprises, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on May 17, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2016)
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
SMITH-ANDERSON ENTERPRISES, INC.
R NIA
S
J
ER
H
8
RT
7
. Chen
ward M
udge Ed
NO
6
JOHN D. MASON, (admitted pro hac vice)
COPYRIGHT COUNSELORS, LLC
7315 Wisconsin Ave., Ste. 400 West
Bethesda, MD 20814
Telephone: (888) 313-3637
jmason@copyrightcounselors.com
FO
5
TED
GRAN
LI
4
A
3
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
2
J. SCOTT GERIEN, State Bar No. 184728
CHRISTOPHER J. PASSARELLI, State Bar No. 241174
DICKENSON, PEATMAN & FOGARTY
1455 First Street, Suite 301
Napa, California 94559
Telephone: (707) 252-7122
tmltg@dpf-law.com
UNIT
ED
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Dated: May 17, 2016
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
RACHEAL TURNER (State Bar No. 226441)
FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 954-4400
rturner@fbm.com
Attorneys for Defendants
BOSTON EAST TYNGSBORO HOLDINGS LLC, d/b/a
STONEHEDGE INN & SPA; BOSTON EAST INDIA
HOTELS LLC; STONEHEDGE CELLARS LLC
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
SMITH-ANDERSON ENTERPRISES,
INC,
CASE NO. 16-CV-01361-EMC
STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND
DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO
RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS
21
Plaintiff,
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
vs.
BOSTON EAST TYNGSBORO
HOLDINGS, LLC, d/b/a STONEHEDGE
INN & SPA; BOSTON EAST INDIA
HOTELS, LLC; STONEHEDGE
CELLARS, LLC; and BENCHMARK
WINE GROUP, INC.
Defendants.
STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND
DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO
DISMISS
1
Case No. 16-CV-01361-EMC
1
FOR GOOD CAUSE, pursuant the Hon. Edward M. Chen’s instruction that the parties
2
engage in additional meet-and-confer efforts regarding Plaintiff’s Motion to Change Time For
3
Briefing on (1) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and (2) Plaintiff’s Motion for Jurisdictional
4
Discovery (ECF-32), the parties stipulate to extend today’s deadline for Plaintiff to respond to
5
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF-25) for one week, to afford the parties the opportunity to
6
confer and inform the court accordingly of the outcome of such discussion.
7
In the event that the parties remain unable reach an agreement regarding a modified
8
briefing schedule, the parties will so notify the Court and in that event, shall respectfully request
9
that the Court proceed to schedule a conference call between the parties, as directed by the Hon.
10
Edward M. Chen.
11
12
Respectfully submitted,
13
14
Dated: May 16, 2016
DICKENSON, PEATMAN & FOGARTY
By
15
16
17
/s/ Christopher J. Passarelli
J. Scott Gerien
Christopher J. Passarelli
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
SMITH-ANDERSON ENTERPRISES, INC.
18
19
20
21
Dated: May 16, 2016
FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
By
22
/s/ Racheal Turner
Racheal Turner
23
Attorneys for Defendants,
BOSTON EAST TYNGSBORO
HOLDINGS LLC, d/b/a STONEHEDGE
INN & SPA; BOSTON EAST INDIA
HOTELS LLC; STONEHEDGE CELLARS LLC
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND
DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO
DISMISS
2
Case No. 16-CV-01361-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?