Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bivona et al

Filing 103

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 101 Re Initial Case Management Conference Date filed by John V. Bivona, Anne Bivona. Case Management Statement due by 6/30/2016. Further Case Management Conference reset for 7/7/2016 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP JAHAN P. RAISSI (Bar #168599) jraissi@sflaw.com One Maritime Plaza, Eighteenth Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3598 Telephone: (415) 421 -6500 Facsimile: (415)421-2922 jraissi@sflaw.com Attorneys for Defendants JOHN V. BIVONA, SADDLE RIVER ADVISORS LLC and ANNE BIVONA 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 (^ s w 38^ ^.^ w w Si|§ 15 Q w 16 19 20 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE V. JOHN V. BP/ONA, SADDLE RIVER ADVISORS LLC; SRA MANAGEMENT LLC; FRANK GREGORY MAZZOLA, Defendants, and 17 18 Case No. 3:16-cv-01386-EMC Plaintiff, 13 1^ 14 sB SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, SRA I LLC; SRA II LLC; SRA HI LLC; FELIX INVESTMENTS, LLC; MICHELE J. MAZZOLA; ANNE BIVONA; CLEAR SAILING GROUP IV LLC; CLEAR SAILING GROUP V LLC, Relief Defendants. 21 22 The parties hereby submit the following Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to move the 23 Initial Case Management Conference from its currently scheduled date of June 23, 2016, to the 24 proposed new date of June 30, 2016. 25 STIPULATION 26 27 WHEREAS, the Initial Case JVIanagement Conference is presently scheduled for June 23, 2016,atl:30p.m.; 28 WHEREAS, the undersigned counsel for Mr. Bivona and other Defendants and Relief -1- Case No. 3:16-cv-01386-EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE INITIAL CMC DATE 1 2 3 Defendants (as set forth in the signature block below) is out of town on June 23, 2016; and WHEREAS, the parties have stipulated as follows and request the Court approve this stipulation: 4 1. The current Initial Case IVtanagement Conference date of June 23, 2016, at 1:30 5 p.m. is vacated. The parties request that the Initial Case Management Conference be scheduled 6| for June 30, 2016, at 1:30 p.m. The parties recognize that the Court usually holds Case 7| Management Conferences at 9:30 a.m., but due to the unavailability of one of the attorneys in the 8 morning the parties request that the Conference be scheduled at 1:30 p.m. if possible. If not 9| possible to hold the Conference at that time, the parties request that it be set for July 7,2016,at 10 I 11 9:30 a.m. SO STIPULATED. 12| DATED: May 26, 201 6 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ^^ w ri 8S 1§|5. to E ^ o COMMISSION 13 14 c/3 3 Q 0 By: //s// By permission (Civ. L.R. 5-1 (i)) l^l! 15 JOHN YUN ©0 w 6Sg ig CO Attorneys for Plaintiff 17 18 DATED: May 26, 2016 SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP 19 20 JAHA^ P. RAISSI 21 Attorneys for Defendants JOHN V. BIVONA, SADDLE RIVER ADVISORS LLC AND ANNE BIVONA 22 23 And Specially Appearing for SRA MANAGEMENT LLC, SRA I LLC, SRA II LLC, SRA III LLC, FELIX INVESTMENTS, LLC, CLEAR SAILING GROUP IV LLC, AND CLEAR SAILING GROUP V LLC 24 I 25 26 I 27 28 -2- Case No. 3:16-cv-01386-EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE INITIAL CMC DATE 1 SICHENZIA ROSS FRIEDMAN FERENCE LLP DATED: May 26, 2016 2 3 By: //s// By permission (Civ. L.R. 5-l(i)) RICHARD J. BABNICK JR. 4 Attorneys for Defendant Frank Mazzola and 5 Relief Defendant Michelle Mazzola 6 ORDER 7 12 ^8 0^ ? E^o 13 w2Qu 08755\001\7754026.v2 dward Judge E ER H 16 n United States District. Judge M Che RT i^is 15 §s §3^ D RDERE IS SO O FIED IT DI AS MO EDWARD M. CHEN 14 NO illj p-1 S DISTRICT TE C TA N 17 F D IS T IC T O R 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- Case No. 3:16-cv-01386-EMC FO ^ UNIT ED 26 Dated: May _, 2016 S IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 9:30 a.m RT U O 10 _, 2016, at R NIA July 7 LI 9 Based upon the parties' Stipulation, the Initial Case Management Conference is set for A 8 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE INITIAL CMC DATE C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?