Scott v. Arnold

Filing 27

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 26 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER (JOINT) FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE filed by Rickey Leon Scott, Eric Arnold. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 17, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP STEVEN A. HIRSCH - #171825 shirsch@keker.com STEVEN P. RAGLAND - #221076 sragland@keker.com NEHA MEHTA - #298771 nmehta@keker.com 633 Battery Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1809 Telephone: 415-391-5400 Facsimile: 415-397-7188 Attorneys for Petitioner RICKEY LEON SCOTT 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 RICKEY LEON SCOTT, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 15 16 v. ERIC ARNOLD, Warden of California State Prison, Solano, Case No. 3:16-cv-01391-JST [Related to case 3:16-cv-06584-JST] STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Respondent. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1281272 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL Case No. 3:16-cv-01391-JST 1 Pursuant to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and the Court’s April 30, 2 2018 Order, the parties to this action, acting through counsel, hereby stipulate to the Dismissal 3 With Prejudice of this action. The related action, 3:16-cv-06584-JST, remains pending. 4 5 SO STIPULATED. Dated: May 14, 2018 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP 6 By: 7 8 9 Attorneys for Petitioner RICKEY LEON SCOTT 10 11 12 /s/ Neha Mehta STEVEN A. HIRSCH STEVEN P. RAGLAND NEHA MEHTA SO STIPULATED. Dated: May 14, 2018 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 13 14 By: 15 /s/ Michele Swanson MICHELE SWANSON Attorney for Respondent ERIC ARNOLD, Warden of California State Prison, Solano 16 17 18 ORDER 19 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 22 Dated: May 17, 2018 HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 1281272 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL Case No. 3:16-cv-01391-JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?