Oracle America, Inc. et al v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company

Filing 38

ORDER REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL re 35 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 4, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., et al., Case No. 16-cv-01393-JST Plaintiffs, 8 v. 9 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY, 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 ORDER REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL Defendant. 12 Re: ECF No. 35 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (“HPE”) moves to file under seal portions of its 13 Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 35. HPE seeks to file under seal because non-party Terix Computer 14 Co. (“Terix”) has designated the material as confidential. Local Rule 79-5 requires that, within 15 four days of the filing of the administrative motion to file under seal, Terix file a declaration 16 establishing that the designated material is sealable. Terix failed to file a declaration in support of 17 sealing within four days of the filing of HPE’s motion on April 29, 2016. Should Terix not file its 18 declaration by May 11, 2016, the Court will deny the motion to file under seal and HPE may file 19 its Motion to Dismiss in the public record. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 4, 2016 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?