Oracle America, Inc. et al v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
Filing
38
ORDER REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL re 35 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 4, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ORACLE AMERICA, INC., et al.,
Case No. 16-cv-01393-JST
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE
COMPANY,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
ORDER REGARDING
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
UNDER SEAL
Defendant.
12
Re: ECF No. 35
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (“HPE”) moves to file under seal portions of its
13
Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 35. HPE seeks to file under seal because non-party Terix Computer
14
Co. (“Terix”) has designated the material as confidential. Local Rule 79-5 requires that, within
15
four days of the filing of the administrative motion to file under seal, Terix file a declaration
16
establishing that the designated material is sealable. Terix failed to file a declaration in support of
17
sealing within four days of the filing of HPE’s motion on April 29, 2016. Should Terix not file its
18
declaration by May 11, 2016, the Court will deny the motion to file under seal and HPE may file
19
its Motion to Dismiss in the public record.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 4, 2016
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?