Oracle America, Inc. et al v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
Filing
69
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 66 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Extend Time To Respond To Complaint filed by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 25, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
JEFFREY T. THOMAS, SBN 106409
jtthomas@gibsondunn.com
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
3161 Michelson Drive
Irvine, CA 92612-4412
Telephone: 949.451.3800
Facsimile: 949.451.4220
SAMUEL LIVERSIDGE, SBN 180578
sliversidge@gibsondunn.com
BLAINE H. EVANSON, SBN 254338
bevanson@gibsondunn.com
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone: 213.229.7000
Facsimile: 213.229.7520
Attorneys for Defendant
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORACLE AMERICA, INC., a Delaware
corporation; and ORACLE
INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a
California corporation,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CASE NO. 3:16-cv-01393-JST
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
PURSUANT TO L.R. 6-2
ACTION FILED: March 22, 2016
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE
COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; and
DOES 1-50,
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
– CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01393-JST
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
WHEREAS, on July 15, 2016, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendant Hewlett
Packard Enterprise Company’s (“HPE”) motion to dismiss and granted Plaintiffs Oracle America,
Inc. and Oracle International Corp. (“Oracle”) 30 days, or until August 15, 2016, to amend their
complaint, (ECF 65);
WHEREAS, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)(A), HPE’s answer to Oracle’s current
complaint is currently due on July 29, 2016;
WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and Oracle has indicated that it may file an
amended complaint on or before August 15, 2016;
WHEREAS, HPE would then have to file a response to any amended complaint;
WHEREAS, the parties agree it would be more efficient for HPE to file a single response to
the operative complaint rather than having to file a separate answer to the current complaint and
response to any amended complaint;
THEREFORE, subject to the approval of the Court, the parties hereby stipulate that HPE shall
have until the earlier of (i) 14 days following the date Oracle files its amended complaint, or (ii)
August 29, 2016, to file its response to the operative complaint.
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: July 21, 2016
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
21
22
23
24
25
26
By: /s/
Blaine H. Evanson
Blaine H. Evanson
Attorneys for Defendant
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY
I hereby attest that all signatories to this stipulation
concur in its filing.
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
1
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
– CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01393-JST
1
2
Dated: July 21, 2016
LATHAM & WATKINS, LLP
3
4
Christopher B. Campbell
Christopher B. Campbell
By: /s/
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ORACLE AMERICA, INC. AND ORACLE
INTERNATIONAL CORP.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Pursuant to Stipulation, it is SO ORDERED. Defendant Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Co.’s
response to Oracle’s operative complaint shall be due by the earlier of (i) 14 days following the date
Oracle files its amended complaint, or (ii) August 29, 2016.
S
DATED: July 25, 2016
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
15
[PROPOSED] ORDER
____________________________________
17
The Honorable JonORD
S. Tigar
T IS SO
United I
States District Judge
UNIT
ED
16
RT
20
ER
. Ti ga r
22
A
H
21
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
2
R NIA
nS
J u d ge J o
FO
NO
19
LI
18
ERED
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
– CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01393-JST
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?