Oracle America, Inc. et al v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company

Filing 95

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 94 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending Deadlines for Oracle's Motion to Strike HPE's Answer filed by Oracle America, Inc., Oracle International Corporation. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 5, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Christopher S. Yates (SBN 161273)
Christopher B. Campbell (SBN 254776)
Meaghan P. Thomas-Kennedy (SBN 303578)
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94111-6538
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.395.8095
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
ORACLE CORPORATION
Dorian Daley (SBN 129049)
Deborah K. Miller (SBN 95527)
500 Oracle Parkway
M/S 5op7
Redwood City, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.506.7114
Email [e-mail]
[e-mail]

ORACLE CORPORATION
Jeffrey S. Ross (SBN 138172)
10 Van de Graaff Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 781.238.6273
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Oracle America, Inc., and Oracle
International Corporation

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., a Delaware
corporation; ORACLE INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION, a California corporation
Plaintiffs,
v.

Case No. 16-cv-01393-JST
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
DEADLINES FOR ORACLE’S
MOTION TO STRIKE HPE’S
ANSWER

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE
COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; and DOES
1–50,
Defendants.

25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME FOR ORACLE TO MOVE TO STRIKE
CASE NO. 16-cv-01393-JST

1
2
3

WHEREAS, Defendant Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Co. (“HPE”) filed its Amended
Answer to Oracle’s First Amended Complaint (“Answer”) on September 14, 2016;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Oracle America, Inc. and Oracle International Corporation’s

4

(collectively, “Oracle”) last day to move to strike all or some portion of HPE’s Answer is

5

October 11, 2016;

6

WHEREAS, Oracle and HPE and have agreed to extend Oracle’s deadline to move to

7

strike all or some portion of HPE’s Answer and the deadline for HPE to oppose Oracle’s motion;

8

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, and ask the Court to order, as follows:

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

1. Oracle shall have up to and including October 18, 2016 in which to file a motion
to strike all or some portion of HPE’s Answer.
2. HPE shall have up to and including November 8, 2016 in which to file its
opposition to Oracle’s motion.
3. Oracle shall have up to and including November 15, 2016 to file its reply in
support of its motion to strike.
Dated: October 5, 2016

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
By:

/s/ Christopher S. Yates
Christopher S. Yates
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Oracle America, Inc. and
Oracle International Corporation

19
20
21

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

22
23

By:

/s/ Blaine H. Evanson
Blaine H. Evanson
Attorneys for Defendant
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company.

24
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

1

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME FOR ORACLE TO MOVE TO STRIKE
CASE NO. 16-cv-01393-JST

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3

Dated: October 5, 2016

4

Hon. Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

2

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME FOR ORACLE TO MOVE TO STRIKE
CASE NO. 16-cv-01393-JST

1
2

ATTESTATION
I, Christopher S. Yates, am counsel for Plaintiffs Oracle America, Inc. and

3

Oracle International Corporation. I am the registered ECF user whose username and password

4

are being used to file this stipulation and proposed order. In compliance with Local Rule

5

5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the above-identified counsel concurred in this filing.

6
7
8
9

Dated: October 5, 2016

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
By:

/s/ Christopher S. Yates
Christopher S. Yates
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Oracle America, Inc. and
Oracle International Corporation

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

3

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME FOR ORACLE TO MOVE TO STRIKE
CASE NO. 16-cv-01393-JST