Via Licensing Corporation v. Compal Electronics, Inc. et al
Filing
39
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 37 Stipulation Regarding New Hearing Date on Defendant Compal Electronics, Inc.'s 29 Motion to Dismiss and Extension of Deadline for Defendant to File Reply to Plaintiff's 35 Opposition to Motion to Dismiss. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
ROBERT J. BENSON (STATE BAR NO. 155971)
rbenson@orrick.com
ABIGAIL W. LLOYD (STATE BAR NO. 243971)
alloyd@orrick.com
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
2050 Main Street
Suite 1100
Irvine, California 92614-8255
Telephone:
+1-949-567-6700
Facsimile:
+1-949-567-6710
6
7
8
9
I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (STATE BAR NO. 173985)
nchatterjee@orrick.com
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone:
+1-650-614-7400
Facsimile:
+1-650-614-7401
10
11
Attorneys for Defendant
COMPAL ELECTRONICS, INC.
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
VIA LICENSING CORPORATION,
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
v.
COMPAL ELECTRONICS, INC.,
18
Defendants.
19
20
Case No. 3:16-cv-01409-HSG
STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING NEW HEARING DATE
ON DEFENDANT COMPAL
ELECTRONICS, INC.’S MOTION TO
DISMISS AND EXTENSION OF
DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO
FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO
DISMISS
Date:
Time:
Judge:
Courtroom:
21
December 1, 2016
2:00 pm
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
10, 19th Floor
22
23
24
25
THE PARTIES AGREE AND STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:
26
WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is currently scheduled for
27
28
October 27, 2016;
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING NEW HEARING DATE ON
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND EXTENSION OF DEFENDANT’S REPLY
DEADLINE - CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01409-HSG
OHSUSA:765809885
1
2
3
WHEREAS, the parties have set a Mediation date for October 27, 2016, consistent with
the Court’s Order Selecting ADR Process entered July 27, 2016;
WHEREAS, to accommodate the schedule of the mediator and the parties, Plaintiff and
4
Defendant have agreed to move the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss to the next
5
available hearing date on the Court’s calendar, December 1, 2016; and
6
7
WHEREAS, Plaintiff has agreed to give Defendant a one-week extension of time to file
its reply brief in response to Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.
8
WHEREFOR, the parties stipulate as follows:
9
1.
That the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, currently set for October 27,
10
2016, at 2:00 p.m., be moved to the next available hearing date of December 1, 2016, at 2:00
11
p.m.; and
12
2.
That Defendant be given an additional week, or until September 22, 2016, to file
13
and serve their reply brief to Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.
14
Dated: September 13, 2016
15
I. NEEL CHATTERJEE
ROBERT J. BENSON
ABIGAIL W. LLOYD
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
16
17
By: /s/ Robert J. Benson
ROBERT J. BENSON
Attorneys for Defendant
COMPAL ELECTRONICS, INC.
18
19
20
21
Dated: September 13, 2016
22
LAURA KABLER OSWELL
THOMAS E. FULLERTON
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
23
By: /s/ Laura Kabler Oswell
LAURA KABLER OSWELL
Attorneys for Plaintiff
VIA LICENSING
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING NEW HEARING DATE ON
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND EXTENSION OF DEFENDANT’S REPLY
DEADLINE - CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01409-HSG
OHSUSA:765809885
1
2
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
DATED: SEPTEMBER 15, 2016
HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING NEW HEARING DATE ON
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND EXTENSION OF DEFENDANT’S REPLY
DEADLINE - CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01409-HSG
OHSUSA:765809885
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?