Via Licensing Corporation v. Compal Electronics, Inc. et al

Filing 39

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 37 Stipulation Regarding New Hearing Date on Defendant Compal Electronics, Inc.'s 29 Motion to Dismiss and Extension of Deadline for Defendant to File Reply to Plaintiff's 35 Opposition to Motion to Dismiss. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2016)

1
2
3
4
5

ROBERT J. BENSON (STATE BAR NO. 155971)
[e-mail]
ABIGAIL W. LLOYD (STATE BAR NO. 243971)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
2050 Main Street
Suite 1100
Irvine, California 92614-8255
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

6
7
8
9

I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (STATE BAR NO. 173985)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

10
11

Attorneys for Defendant
COMPAL ELECTRONICS, INC.

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

VIA LICENSING CORPORATION,

15
16
17

Plaintiff,
v.
COMPAL ELECTRONICS, INC.,

18

Defendants.

19
20

Case No. 3:16-cv-01409-HSG
STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING NEW HEARING DATE
ON DEFENDANT COMPAL
ELECTRONICS, INC.’S MOTION TO
DISMISS AND EXTENSION OF
DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO
FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO
DISMISS
Date:
Time:
Judge:
Courtroom:

21

December 1, 2016
2:00 pm
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
10, 19th Floor

22
23
24
25

THE PARTIES AGREE AND STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

26

WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is currently scheduled for

27
28

October 27, 2016;
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING NEW HEARING DATE ON
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND EXTENSION OF DEFENDANT’S REPLY
DEADLINE - CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01409-HSG
OHSUSA:765809885

1
2
3

WHEREAS, the parties have set a Mediation date for October 27, 2016, consistent with
the Court’s Order Selecting ADR Process entered July 27, 2016;
WHEREAS, to accommodate the schedule of the mediator and the parties, Plaintiff and

4

Defendant have agreed to move the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss to the next

5

available hearing date on the Court’s calendar, December 1, 2016; and

6
7

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has agreed to give Defendant a one-week extension of time to file
its reply brief in response to Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.

8

WHEREFOR, the parties stipulate as follows:

9

1.

That the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, currently set for October 27,

10

2016, at 2:00 p.m., be moved to the next available hearing date of December 1, 2016, at 2:00

11

p.m.; and

12

2.

That Defendant be given an additional week, or until September 22, 2016, to file

13

and serve their reply brief to Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.

14

Dated: September 13, 2016

15

I. NEEL CHATTERJEE
ROBERT J. BENSON
ABIGAIL W. LLOYD
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

16
17

By: /s/ Robert J. Benson
ROBERT J. BENSON
Attorneys for Defendant
COMPAL ELECTRONICS, INC.

18
19
20
21

Dated: September 13, 2016

22

LAURA KABLER OSWELL
THOMAS E. FULLERTON
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP

23
By: /s/ Laura Kabler Oswell
LAURA KABLER OSWELL
Attorneys for Plaintiff
VIA LICENSING

24
25
26
27
28

2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING NEW HEARING DATE ON
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND EXTENSION OF DEFENDANT’S REPLY
DEADLINE - CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01409-HSG
OHSUSA:765809885

1
2

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4

DATED: SEPTEMBER 15, 2016
HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING NEW HEARING DATE ON
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND EXTENSION OF DEFENDANT’S REPLY
DEADLINE - CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01409-HSG
OHSUSA:765809885