Rushing v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. et al

Filing 122

ORDER granting 121 STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR 119 DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - Responses due by 5/18/2018. Replies due by 6/1/2018. Motion Hearing continued to 6/13/2018 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor before Judge William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 04/18/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2018)

1 HAEGGQUIST & ECK, LLP
AMBER L. ECK (177882)
2 225 Broadway, Suite 2050
San Diego, CA 92101
3
Telephone: [phone]
4 Email: [e-mail]
5 ROSE LAW GROUP, PC
KATHRYN HONECKER (pro hac vice)
6 7144 E. Stetson Drive, Suite 300
Scottsdale, AZ 85251
7
Telephone: [phone]
8 Email: [e-mail]
9 [Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page]
10 Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
WILLIAM RUSHING, Individually and on
15 Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated,

CLASS ACTION

16
17

Case No.: 3:16-cv-01421-WHO

Plaintiff,
STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v.

18
WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC., et al.,
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Defendants.

Assigned to the Honorable William H. Orrick
Courtroom: 2
Date: May 16, 2018
Time: 2:00 p.m.
Complaint Filed: January 29, 2016
Action Removed: March 23, 2016
7th Amd. Complaint Filed: April 4, 2017
Trial Date: None Set

1

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

2

Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff

3

William Rushing (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Williams-Sonoma, Inc., Williams-Sonoma DTC,

4

Inc., and Williams-Sonoma Advertising, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”), by and through their

5

respective counsel, hereby respectfully stipulate and jointly request that the Court approve the

6

briefing schedule agreed upon by the parties regarding Defendants’ Motion for Summary

7

Judgment (“MSJ”), as set forth below.

8
9
10

RECITALS
On April 10, 2018, Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment with a hearing date
of May 16, 2018. Dkt. 119.
Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules of the Northern District of

12
HAEGGQUIST & ECK, LLP

11

California, and the deadlines set forth on CM-ECF, Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ MSJ is

13

due by April 24, 2018, and Defendants’ Reply is due by May 1, 2018.

14

Plaintiff has requested additional time to potentially conduct discovery and respond to

15

Defendants’ MSJ. Since that extension would cause the Reply date to conflict with Memorial

16

Day, the parties have agreed upon a briefing schedule which accommodates Plaintiff’s request and

17

the Memorial Day holiday, subject to the Court’s approval.

18
19
20

STIPULATION
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, by and through their respective
counsel, that the briefing schedule on Defendants’ MSJ shall be revised as follows:

21

1.

May 18, 2018 – Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ MSJ;

22

2.

June 1, 2018 – Defendants’ Reply in support of their MSJ; and

23

3.

June 13, 2018 – Hearing on MSJ.

24

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

25 Dated: April 18, 2018
26
27
28

HAEGGQUIST & ECK, LLP
AMBER L. ECK (177882)
By:

/s/Amber L. Eck
AMBER L. ECK

Case No. 3:16-cv-01421-WHO - STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

225 Broadway, Suite 2050
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

1
2
3

ROSE LAW GROUP, PC
KATHRYN HONECKER (pro hac vice)
7144 E. Stetson Drive, Suite 300
Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

4
5
6
7

11

BAKER LAW, PC
GEORGE RICHARD BAKER (224003)
436 N. Stanley Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90036
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

12

Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class

8
9

HAEGGQUIST & ECK, LLP

10

13
Dated: April 18, 2018
14
15
16

SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER
& HAMPTON LLP
P. CRAIG CARDON (168646)
BENJAMIN O. AIGBOBOH (268531)
ERIC J. DIIULIO (301439)

17
By:
18
19
20
21
22
23

/s/Eric J. DiIulio
ERIC J. DIIULIO

Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4109
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants

24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 3:16-cv-01421-WHO - STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1

SIGNATURE APPROVAL

2

The filing attorney attests that she has obtained concurrence regarding the filing of this

3

document from the signatories to this document.

4

Dated: April 18, 2018
/s/Amber L. Eck
AMBER L. ECK

5
6
7

***

8

ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED as modified below.

9

The briefing schedule on Defendants’ MSJ shall be revised as follows:

10

1.

May 18, 2018 – Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ MSJ;

12
HAEGGQUIST & ECK, LLP

11

2.

June 1, 2018 – Defendants’ Reply in support of their MSJ; and

13

3.

June 20, 2018 – Hearing on MSJ.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

14
15
16
17

Dated:

April 18, 2018
THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 3:16-cv-01421-WHO - STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT