Rushing v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. et al
Filing
57
ORDER granting 56 STIPULATION to Continue Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss from February 8, 2017 to February 22, 2017. Hearing on 50 Motion to Dismiss set for 2/22/2017 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/20/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ROSE LAW GROUP
KATHRYN HONECKER (pro hac vice)
AUDRA PETROLLE (pro hac vice)
LAUREN NAGEOTTE (pro hac vice)
7144 E Stetson Drive, Suite 300
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251
Telephone:
480.505.3936
Email:
khonecker@roselawgroup.com
apetrolle@roselawgroup.com
lnageotte@roselawgroup.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class [Additional Counsel on Signature Page]
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
P. CRAIG CARDON, Cal. Bar No. 168646
BENJAMIN O. AIGBOBOH, Cal. Bar No. 268531
ERIC J. DIIULIO, Cal. Bar No. 301439
Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4109
Telephone:
415.434.9100
Email:
ccardon@sheppardmullin.com
baigboboh@sheppardmullin.com
ediiulio@sheppardmullin.com
Attorneys for Defendants
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
WILLIAM RUSHING, Individually and on
Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated,
19
Plaintiff,
20
21
22
v.
WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC., et al.,
23
Defendants.
Case No. 3:16-cv-01421-WHO
Assigned to the Hon. William H. Orrick
CLASS ACTION
STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE
HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO DISMISS FROM FEBRUARY 8, 2017
TO FEBRUARY 22, 2017;
ORDER THEREON.
Complaint Filed:
Action Removed:
5th Am. Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:
24
25
26
January 29, 2016
March 23, 2016
October 24, 2016
None Set
27
28
SMRH:480624621.2
Case No. 3:16-cv-01421-WHO
STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING
ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff
3
William Rushing (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Williams-Sonoma, Inc., Williams-Sonoma DTC,
4
Inc., and Williams-Sonoma Advertising, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”), by and through their
5
respective counsel, hereby respectfully stipulate and jointly request that the Court continue the
6
hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. 50) from February 8, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. to
7
February 22, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.
RECITALS
8
9
WHEREAS, on December 6, 2016, the Court granted the parties’ stipulated request to
10
extend the briefing schedule and set the hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss for February 8,
11
2017. (Dkt. 52.)
12
13
14
WHEREAS, lead counsel for Defendants will be out of the country for business on
February 8, 2017.
WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred, and Plaintiff has agreed to join this
15
request to continue the hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss to February 22, 2017 at 2:00
16
p.m. so that lead counsel for both parties may attend.
17
WHEREAS, all previous time modifications in the case are as follows:
18
•
19
20
to the First Amended Complaint from March 30, 2016 to April 20, 2016;
•
21
22
on March 29, 2016, the parties stipulated to extend Defendants’ deadline to respond
on May 5, 2016, pursuant to stipulation of the parties, the Court continued the June
21, 2016 Case Management Conference to September 6, 2016;
•
on June 23, 2016, the parties stipulated to extend Defendants’ deadline to respond
23
to the Third Amended Class Action Complaint from June 23, 2016 to June 27,
24
2016;
25
•
26
on August 4, 2016, pursuant to stipulation of the parties, the Court continued the
September 6, 2016 Case Management Conference to September 13, 2016;
27
28
-1SMRH:480624621.2
Case No. 3:16-cv-01421-WHO
STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING
ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
•
1
on August 23, 2016, pursuant to stipulation of the parties, the Court continued the
2
September 13, 2016 Case Management Conference, and on September 26, 2016 the
3
Court scheduled the Case Management Conference for November 8, 2016;
•
4
on October 5, 2016, pursuant to stipulation of the parties, the Court continued
5
Defendants’ deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Class Action
6
Complaint, set the briefing schedule for Defendants’ response to Plaintiff’s Fifth
7
Amended Class Action Complaint, set the hearing on Defendants motion to dismiss
8
for January 11, 2017, and continued the Case Management Conference to February
9
7, 2016; and
•
10
on December 6, 2016, pursuant to stipulation of the parties, the Court extended the
11
opposition and reply briefing deadlines, continued the hearing on Defendants’
12
motion to dismiss to February 8, 2017, and continued the Case Management
13
Conference to February 28, 2017.
14
15
WHEREAS, the continuance requested by the parties will not otherwise affect the schedule
for the case.
16
WHEREAS, Eric DiIulio attests that Kathryn Honecker concurs in filing this stipulation.
17
///
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
-2SMRH:480624621.2
Case No. 3:16-cv-01421-WHO
STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING
ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
STIPULATION
1
2
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, by and
3
through their respective counsel, that the hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. 50)
4
should be continued from February 8, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. to February 22, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.
5
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
6
7
Dated: January 18, 2017
ROSE LAW GROUP, PC
8
By
9
10
/s/ Kathryn Honecker
Kathryn Honecker (pro hac vice)
Audra Petrolle (pro hac vice)
Lauren Nageotte (pro hac vice)
11
-and-
12
George Richard Baker, Cal. Bar No. 224003
BAKER LAW, PC
436 N. Stanley Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90036
Telephone:
323.452.9685
Email:
richard@bakerlawpc.com
13
14
15
16
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class
17
18
Dated: January 18, 2017
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
19
By
20
P. Craig Cardon
Benjamin O. Aigboboh
Eric J. DiIulio
21
22
Attorneys for Defendants
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3SMRH:480624621.2
Case No. 3:16-cv-01421-WHO
STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING
ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
ORDER
1
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
3
4
DATED:
January 20
5
, 2017
The Honorable William H. Orrick
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4SMRH:480624621.2
Case No. 3:16-cv-01421-WHO
STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING
ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?