Spencer v. Cano

Filing 4

ORDER OF TRANSFER. Case is transferred to the Central District of California, Western Division. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim on 3/30/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 JAMAL LEE SPENCER, Petitioner, Case No. 16-cv-01449-SK (PR) 7 v. ORDER OF TRANSFER 8 9 DEBBIE ASUNCION, Acting Warden, Respondent. (Dkt. #2) 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Petitioner seeks federal habeas review of a conviction from Los Angeles County 12 Superior Court, which lies within the venue of the Central District of California, Western 13 Division. See 28 U.S.C. § 84(c)(2). Petitioner is incarcerated at California State Prison, 14 Los Angeles County, which also lies within the venue of the Central District of California, 15 Western Division. See id. 16 Venue is proper in a habeas action in either the district of confinement or the district 17 of conviction, see 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); however, petitions challenging a conviction 18 preferably are heard in the district of conviction. See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); Dannenberg 19 v. Ingle, 831 F. Supp. 767, 767 (N.D. Cal. 1993). 20 Because the County of Los Angeles lies in the Central District of California, 21 Western Division, the court ORDERS that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and Habeas 22 Local Rule 2254-3(b), and in the interest of justice, this petition be TRANSFERRED to the 23 United States District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division. 24 The clerk shall transfer this matter and terminate all pending motions as moot. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: March 30, 2016 _________________________ SALLIE KIM United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?