01 Communications, Inc. v. AT&T Corp.

Filing 28

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 27 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT filed by 01 Communications, Inc. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on May, 9 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2016)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 (San Francisco Division) 4 5 O1 COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Plaintiff, v. 6 7 8 Case No. 3:16-cv-01452-VC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME AT&T CORPORATION Defendant Motion Served: Current Response Date: New Response Date: New Reply Date: New Hearing Date: 9 10 11 April 26, 2016 May 9, 2016 May 24, 2016 June 1, 2016 June 16, 2016 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 On May 6, 2016, Plaintiff O1 Communications, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant AT&T Corporation stipulated and agreed to requested a two-week continuance in the dates for Plaintiff’s Response and Defendant’s Reply to the Motion to Dismiss. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, the parties may stipulate to extend the time for filings that would affect the date of an event or deadline already fixed by Court order. The new deadlines for the Response and Reply necessitate rescheduling the hearing date for the Motion. GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, the Court approves the Stipulations and ORDERS Plaintiffs to respond to the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss by May 24, 2016, and Defendants to reply by June 1, 2016. Further, the hearing date is extended until June 16, 2016. 9th Dated this ___ day of May, 2016. By: _______________________ Judge Vince Chhabria 27 28 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?