Terrill Johnson v. Q.E.D. Environmental Systems Inc.

Filing 115

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/09/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 SETAREH LAW GROUP Shaun Setareh, Bar No. 204514 shaun@setarehlaw.com Thomas Segal, Bar No. 222791 thomas@setarehlaw.com 9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 907 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Telephone: (310) 888-7771 Facsimile: (310) 888-0109 Attorneys for Plaintiff Terrill Johnson ROBINS KAPLAN LLP Michael A. Geibelson, Bar No. 179970 mgeibelson@robinskaplan.com 2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400 Los Angeles, CA 90067-3208 Telephone: (310) 552-0130 Facsimile: (310) 229-5800 Attorneys for Defendant Q.E.D. Environmental Systems, Inc. 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 20 21 TERRILL JOHNSON, on behalf of himself, all Case No. 3:16-CV-01454-WHO others similarly situated, and the general public, Hon. William H. Orrick Plaintiff, 22 23 24 25 26 vs. ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Q.E.D. Environmental Systems Inc., a Michigan corporation; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants. 27 28 Johnson v. QED Environmental Systems, Inc. 88785396.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES: 2 Have read and considered the parties’ Stioulation for Dismissal with Prejudice, and good 3 4 5 cause appearing therefor, This action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 6 Each party shall bear its own fees and costs. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED. 8 Dated: March 9, 2018 9 10 By:___________________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2 28 Johnson v. QED Environmental Systems, Inc. 88785396.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?