Terrill Johnson v. Q.E.D. Environmental Systems Inc.
Filing
28
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - Case Management Conference continued to 8/9/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco.(CMC and motion hearing set for 5/11/2016 are VACATED.) Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/10/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
TERRILL JOHNSON,
Case No. 16-cv-01454-WHO
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
9
Q.E.D. ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS
INC.,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
Defendant.
12
13
14
Re: Dkt. No. 24
The Case Management Conference set for May 11, 2016 is continued to the earlier of the
hearing on any motion to dismiss the anticipated amended complaint or August 9, 2016.
For the guidance of the parties, I do not bifurcate discovery between class and merits
15
issues, but discovery must be proportional. Given the failure of plaintiff to meet his minimum
16
pleading standard, prior to the next Case Management Conference discovery is limited to any
17
matters directly relevant to the plaintiff (his employment and termination, the terms and conditions
18
of his employment, and defenses to his individual claims), as opposed to the class, and relevant
19
written wage and hour policies of the defendant. Defendant should also serve objections to the
20
rest of the propounded discovery as appropriate on the assumption that the amended complaint is
21
allowed to proceed. The parties should meet and confer over the objections prior to the Case
22
Management Conference so that the case management schedule is not delayed. The parties need
23
not file a new Joint Case Management Statement a week before the CMC unless they wish to
24
update me on developments since May 4, 2016.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 10, 2016
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?