Jarell v. Amerigas Propane, Inc.
Filing
36
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 35 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Jimmie Jarell. Further Case Management Conference set for 5/24/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 17, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2017)
1 JOSEPH D. LEE (State Bar No. 110840)
joseph.lee@mto.com
2 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
350 South Grand Avenue, 50th Floor
3 Los Angeles, California 90071-3426
Tel.: (213) 683-9100 / Fax: (213) 687-3702
4
MALCOM A. HEINICKE (State Bar No. 194174)
5 malcom.heinicke@mto.com
AARON D. PENNEKAMP (State Bar No. 290550)
6 aaron.pennekamp@mto.com
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
7 560 Mission Street, 27th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-2907
8 Tel.: (415) 512-4029 / Fax: (415) 644-6929
9 Attorneys for Defendant AMERIGAS
PROPANE, INC.
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14 JIMMIE JARRELL, an individual, on behalf
of himself and all others similarly situated,
15
Plaintiff,
16
vs.
17
AMERIGAS PROPANE, Inc.; a Pennsylvania
18 corporation; and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,
19
Defendants.
20
Case No. 3:16-CV-01481-JST
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar
Date: April 26, 2017
Time: 2:00 p.m.
Courtroom: Courtroom 9 – 19th Fl.
Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3:16-CV-01481-JST
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
Jimmie Jarrell (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant AmeriGas Propane, Inc. (“AmeriGas”)
2 (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and
3 agree as follows:
4
A. ADR Status
5
As previously reported to the Court, the parties reached a settlement of this wage and hour
6 class action in a mediation conducted before Mark Rudy, of Rudy, Exelrod, Zieff & Lowe LLP, a
7 professional mediator with substantial experience in the specialized field of wage and hour class
8 action litigation and mediation. At the conclusion of the mediation, a Memorandum of
9 Understanding was signed, identifying the major terms of the settlement. Counsel for AmeriGas
10 have prepared a first draft of the settlement documents, including a long form settlement
11 agreement, proposed forms for notice to the settlement class members, and proposed preliminary
12 and final approval orders. Class counsel are presently reviewing and commenting on the
13 settlement documents and are preparing a motion for preliminary approval of the settlement.
14
This Court, by order dated February 7, 2017, scheduled a Case Management Conference
15 for April 26, 2017 (“the New Case Management Conference”). The Court further ordered that if a
16 Motion for Preliminary Approval has been filed at least seven days prior to that date, the New
17 Case Management Conference shall be continued to the date set for hearing of the Motion for
18 Preliminary Approval.
19
By this stipulation, the Parties jointly request an additional three weeks within which to
20 finalize the settlement documents and submit a motion for preliminary approval to the Court.
21 Such period is necessary in order to resolve any remaining issues respecting the form of the
22 settlement documents, and to give class counsel sufficient time to draft the preliminary approval
23 motion.
24
B. Stipulation
25
In view of the foregoing, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
26
1. The April 26, 2017 Case Management Conference is vacated.
27
2. A Case Management Conference is scheduled for May 17, 2017 (“the New Case
28
Management Conference”). If a Motion for Preliminary Approval has been filed at
-2STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
3:16-CV-01481-JST
1
least seven days prior to the date set for the New Case Management Conference, the
2
New Case Management Conference shall be continued from the date set pursuant to
3
this Order to the date set for hearing of the Motion for Preliminary Approval.
4 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
5 DATED: April 14, 2017
6
SETAREH LAW GROUP, PC
SHAUN SETAREH
H. SCOTT LEVIANT
7
8
/s/ H. Scott Leviant
By:
H. SCOTT LEVIANT
9
10
Attorneys for Plaintiff JIMMIE JARRELL
11 DATED: April 14, 2017
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
JOSEPH D. LEE
MALCOLM A. HEINICKE
AARON D. PENNEKAMP
12
13
14
15
By:
16
JOSEPH D. LEE
Attorneys for Defendant AMERIGAS PROPANE, INC.
/s/ Joseph D. Lee
17
18
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5.5-1(i)(3)
19
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5.5-1(i)(3), I, H. Scott Leviant, certify that I have obtained the
20 concurrence of all of the other signatories listed below to file this document.
21 Dated: April 14, 2017
SETAREH LAW GROUP
22
By:
23
24
/s/ H. Scott Leviant
H. Scott Leviant
25
26
27
28
33800854.1
-3STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
Jimmie Jarrell (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant AmeriGas Propane, Inc. (“AmeriGas”)
3 (collectively, the “Parties”), entered into a Joint Stipulation to continue the April 26, 2017 Case
4 Management Conference following a provisional class action settlement. After considering the
5 Stipulation of the Parties, the facts upon which the Stipulation is based, and good cause appearing,
6 it is hereby ORDERED that:
7
8
1. The April 26, 2017 Case Management Conference is vacated.
May 24, 2017
2. A Case Management Conference is scheduled for May 17, 2017 (“the New Case
9 Management Conference”). If a Motion for Preliminary Approval has been filed at least seven
10 days prior to the date set for the New Case Management Conference, the New Case Management
11 Conference shall be continued from the date set pursuant to this Order to the date set for hearing of
12 the Motion for Preliminary Approval. The Court will not continue the CMC further.
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
14 Dated: April __, 2017
15
___________________________
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
33800854.1
-4STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?