Jarell v. Amerigas Propane, Inc.

Filing 36

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 35 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Jimmie Jarell. Further Case Management Conference set for 5/24/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 17, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2017)

Download PDF
1 JOSEPH D. LEE (State Bar No. 110840) joseph.lee@mto.com 2 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 350 South Grand Avenue, 50th Floor 3 Los Angeles, California 90071-3426 Tel.: (213) 683-9100 / Fax: (213) 687-3702 4 MALCOM A. HEINICKE (State Bar No. 194174) 5 malcom.heinicke@mto.com AARON D. PENNEKAMP (State Bar No. 290550) 6 aaron.pennekamp@mto.com MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 7 560 Mission Street, 27th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2907 8 Tel.: (415) 512-4029 / Fax: (415) 644-6929 9 Attorneys for Defendant AMERIGAS PROPANE, INC. 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 JIMMIE JARRELL, an individual, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 15 Plaintiff, 16 vs. 17 AMERIGAS PROPANE, Inc.; a Pennsylvania 18 corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 19 Defendants. 20 Case No. 3:16-CV-01481-JST STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar Date: April 26, 2017 Time: 2:00 p.m. Courtroom: Courtroom 9 – 19th Fl. Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3:16-CV-01481-JST STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 Jimmie Jarrell (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant AmeriGas Propane, Inc. (“AmeriGas”) 2 (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and 3 agree as follows: 4 A. ADR Status 5 As previously reported to the Court, the parties reached a settlement of this wage and hour 6 class action in a mediation conducted before Mark Rudy, of Rudy, Exelrod, Zieff & Lowe LLP, a 7 professional mediator with substantial experience in the specialized field of wage and hour class 8 action litigation and mediation. At the conclusion of the mediation, a Memorandum of 9 Understanding was signed, identifying the major terms of the settlement. Counsel for AmeriGas 10 have prepared a first draft of the settlement documents, including a long form settlement 11 agreement, proposed forms for notice to the settlement class members, and proposed preliminary 12 and final approval orders. Class counsel are presently reviewing and commenting on the 13 settlement documents and are preparing a motion for preliminary approval of the settlement. 14 This Court, by order dated February 7, 2017, scheduled a Case Management Conference 15 for April 26, 2017 (“the New Case Management Conference”). The Court further ordered that if a 16 Motion for Preliminary Approval has been filed at least seven days prior to that date, the New 17 Case Management Conference shall be continued to the date set for hearing of the Motion for 18 Preliminary Approval. 19 By this stipulation, the Parties jointly request an additional three weeks within which to 20 finalize the settlement documents and submit a motion for preliminary approval to the Court. 21 Such period is necessary in order to resolve any remaining issues respecting the form of the 22 settlement documents, and to give class counsel sufficient time to draft the preliminary approval 23 motion. 24 B. Stipulation 25 In view of the foregoing, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 26 1. The April 26, 2017 Case Management Conference is vacated. 27 2. A Case Management Conference is scheduled for May 17, 2017 (“the New Case 28 Management Conference”). If a Motion for Preliminary Approval has been filed at -2STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 3:16-CV-01481-JST 1 least seven days prior to the date set for the New Case Management Conference, the 2 New Case Management Conference shall be continued from the date set pursuant to 3 this Order to the date set for hearing of the Motion for Preliminary Approval. 4 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 5 DATED: April 14, 2017 6 SETAREH LAW GROUP, PC SHAUN SETAREH H. SCOTT LEVIANT 7 8 /s/ H. Scott Leviant By: H. SCOTT LEVIANT 9 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff JIMMIE JARRELL 11 DATED: April 14, 2017 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP JOSEPH D. LEE MALCOLM A. HEINICKE AARON D. PENNEKAMP 12 13 14 15 By: 16 JOSEPH D. LEE Attorneys for Defendant AMERIGAS PROPANE, INC. /s/ Joseph D. Lee 17 18 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5.5-1(i)(3) 19 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5.5-1(i)(3), I, H. Scott Leviant, certify that I have obtained the 20 concurrence of all of the other signatories listed below to file this document. 21 Dated: April 14, 2017 SETAREH LAW GROUP 22 By: 23 24 /s/ H. Scott Leviant H. Scott Leviant 25 26 27 28 33800854.1 -3STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Jimmie Jarrell (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant AmeriGas Propane, Inc. (“AmeriGas”) 3 (collectively, the “Parties”), entered into a Joint Stipulation to continue the April 26, 2017 Case 4 Management Conference following a provisional class action settlement. After considering the 5 Stipulation of the Parties, the facts upon which the Stipulation is based, and good cause appearing, 6 it is hereby ORDERED that: 7 8 1. The April 26, 2017 Case Management Conference is vacated. May 24, 2017 2. A Case Management Conference is scheduled for May 17, 2017 (“the New Case 9 Management Conference”). If a Motion for Preliminary Approval has been filed at least seven 10 days prior to the date set for the New Case Management Conference, the New Case Management 11 Conference shall be continued from the date set pursuant to this Order to the date set for hearing of 12 the Motion for Preliminary Approval. The Court will not continue the CMC further. 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 14 Dated: April __, 2017 15 ___________________________ Hon. Jon S. Tigar UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 33800854.1 -4STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?