Tami Weis v. Frances Barbour Melbostad

Filing 22

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT SANCTION COUNSEL FOR FAILING TO APPEAR. Show Cause Response due by 8/5/2016. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 8/4/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

TAMI WEIS,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 16-cv-01584-HSG

v.
FRANCES B MELBOSTAD,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
COURT SHOULD NOT SANCTION
COUNSEL FOR FAILING TO APPEAR

Defendant.

12
13

An initial case management conference was scheduled and held in this case on August 2,

14

2016, at 2:00pm. Dkt. Nos. 20 & 21. Counsel for Defendant Frances Melbostad (“Defendant”),

15

Colleen S. Shaw, failed to appear or explain her absence.

16

The Court hereby ORDERS counsel for Defendant to show cause why the Court should

17

not sanction her for failing to appear at the case management conference. Counsel must file a

18

statement of two pages or less by August 5, 2016, that responds to this Order.

19
20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 8/4/2016

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge