Forreststream Holdings Limited v. Shenkman

Filing 97

STIPULATION AND ORDER to Reschedule Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Motion Hearing set for 3/9/2017 09:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 02/15/2017. (tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Roberto J. Kampfner (SBN 179026)
[e-mail]
Andrew Mackintosh (SBN 266772)
[e-mail]
WHITE & CASE LLP
555 South Flower Street, Suite 2700
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Adam S. Cashman (SBN 255063)
[e-mail]
Katie Erno (SBN 264748)
[e-mail]
SINGER / BEA LLP
601 Montgomery Street, Suite 1950
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Walter C. Cook (SBN 111330)
LAW OFFICES OF WALTER COOK
2995 Woodside Rd., Suite 400
Woodside, CA 94062-2448
Telephone:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17
18
19

FORRESTSTREAM HOLDINGS LIMITED, a
Cyprus company,

21
22
23

FURTHER STIPULATION TO
RESCHEDULE HEARING ON
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff,

20

Case No. 3:16-cv-01609-LB

v.
GREGORY SHENKMAN (AKA GRIGORY
SHENKMAN), an individual,

Action Filed: March 31, 2016
Hearing Date and Time:

Defendant.
Existing:
Proposed:

24

March 2, 2017, 9:30 a.m.
March 9, 2017, 9:30 a.m.

25
26
27
28

Plaintiff Forreststream Holdings Limited, a Cyprus company (“Plaintiff,” or
“Forreststream”) and Defendant Gregory Shenkman (aka Grigory Shenkman), an individual
-1STIPULATION
CASE NO. 16-01609-LB

1

(“Defendant,” or “Shenkman,” and, together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), hereby enter into and

2

submit this stipulation (the “Stipulation”) requesting that the Court reschedule the hearing on

3

Plaintiff’s Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment and in the Alternative Motion for

4

Partial Summary Judgment/Adjudication; Memorandum of Points and Authorities [D.I. 83] (the

5

“Motion”).
RECITALS

6

WHEREAS, at Plaintiff’s request, the Parties previously stipulated to have the Motion

7
8

heard on March 1, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. [D.I. 93]; and
WHEREAS the Court notified the Parties that such date and time was unavailable and

9
10

set the Motion for hearing on March 2, 2017 at 9:30 a.m.; and
WHEREAS Plaintiff’s lead counsel has an unavoidable conflict on March 2, 2017 and

11
12

has requested that Defendant stipulate to a hearing on the Motion on Thursday, March 9, 2017 at

13

9:30 a.m. as part of the Court’s regularly scheduled motion calendar.
STIPULATION

14

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned

15
16

attorneys for Forreststream and Mr. Shenkman, on behalf of their respective clients in the above-

17

captioned action:

18

1.

Subject to approval of the Court, the March 2, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. hearing date

19

currently set for the Motion shall be vacated and the Motion shall be heard by the Court on March 9,

20

2017 at 9:30 a.m.

21
22
23
24

DATED: February 14, 2017

WHITE & CASE LLP
By: /s/ Roberto J. Kampfner___________
Roberto J. Kampfner
Attorneys for Plaintiff

25
SINGER / BEA LLP
26
27
28

By: /s/ Adam S. Cashman
Adam S. Cashman
Attorneys for Defendant

____

-2STIPULATION
CASE NO. 16-01609-LB

1
2
3
4

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I, Roberto J. Kampfner, attest that Adam S. Cashman authorized
me to electronically sign his name and file the above Stipulation via email received at 3:37 p.m. PT
on February 14, 2017.
By: /s/ Roberto J. Kampfner__________

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION
CASE NO. 16-01609-LB

1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10

FORRESTSTREAM HOLDINGS LIMITED, a
Cyprus company,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

Case No. 3:16-cv-01609-LB
ORDER GRANTING FURTHER
STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE
HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT

v.
GREGORY SHENKMAN (AKA GRIGORY
SHENKMAN), an individual,

14

Defendant.

15
The Court, after full consideration of the Further Stipulation to Reschedule Hearing

16
17
18
19

on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Stipulation”), and good cause appearing
therefor:
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21

02/15/2017
Date: _____________________

___________________________________
Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler
U.S. District Court, Northern District of
California

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION
CASE NO. 16-01609-LB