Shareefah Joseph v. Service Employees International Union, United Healthcare West (SEIU UHW)

Filing 27

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 26 Stipulated Request to Extend Deadline for Conducting Mediation; and Proposed Order filed by Service Employees International Union, United Healthcare West (SEIU UHW). Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/11/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 BRUCE A. HARLAND, Bar No. 230477 XOCHITL A. LOPEZ, Bar No. 284909 WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD A Professional Corporation 1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200 Alameda, California 94501 Telephone (510) 337-1001 Fax (510) 337-1023 E-Mail: bharland@unioncounsel.net xlopez@unioncounsel.net 6 7 Attorneys for Defendant, SEIU, UNITED HEALTHCARE WORKERS-WEST 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 No. 3:16-cv-01644-EMC SHAREEFAH JOSEPH, Plaintiff, v. STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR CONDUCTING MEDIATION; AND PROPOSED ORDER SEIU, UNITED HEALTHCARE WORKERSWEST, Defendant. 16 17 18 19 Pursuant to ADR L.R. 6-7 and L.R. 7-12, Plaintiffs and Defendant seek to extend the time 20 for conducting mediation in this matter. The considerations supporting the request, as stipulated, 21 are set forth below: 22 The Parties voluntarily agreed to conduct a private mediation in this dispute to determine 23 24 Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, the Court ordered that private mediation was to be completed 27 within one-hundred and fifty (150) days from the date of that hearing. The Court subsequently 28 A Professional Corporation to FRCP 12(b)(6). On July 21, 2016, during the Case Management Conference and hearing on 26 1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200 Alameda, California 94501 (510) 337-1001 agreed to delay discovery until after final adjudication of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant 25 WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD whether settlement may be achieved without the necessity for further litigation. The Parties entered an order partially granting and partially denying Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, thus STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR CONDUCTING MEDIATION; AND PROPOSED ORDER Case No. 3:16-cv-01644-EMC 1 clarifying the disputes subject to further litigation. Plaintiff declined to file an amended 2 complaint, and Defendant filed its Answer on September 14, 2016. 3 The Parties now desire to engage in meaningful discovery for the purpose of facilitating 4 settlement prior to any mediation. The mediator selected by the Parties is unavailable until after 5 the Court’s deadline for conducting mediation—the earliest availability being in December 2016 6 and January 2017. In order to retain the neutral mediator selected by the Parties, and in order to 7 have sufficient opportunity to engage in discovery, and to preserve the Parties’ resources and the 8 resources of the Court, the Parties jointly request an extension of the deadline to conduct 9 mediation to January 31, 2017, which is three weeks prior to the Parties’ next Case Management 10 Conference. 11 Dated: October 7, 2016 WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD A Professional Corporation 13 14 By: 15 16 17 Dated: October 7, 2016 19 GOYETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. /S/ GARY G. GOYETTE GARY G. GOYETTE Attorneys for Plaintiff, SHAREEFAH JOSEPH 21 UNIT ED 23 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: October 11, 2016 DERED O OR IT IS S . Chen NO ward M HON. EDWARD M. CHENe Ed Judg JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT 26 RT 27 ER WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD A Professional Corporation 1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200 Alameda, California 94501 (510) 337-1001 140652\884787 2 A H 28 RT U O S 22 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA 20 FO 18 /S/ BRUCE A. HARLAND BRUCE A. HARLAND XOCHITL A. LOPEZ Attorneys for Defendant, SEIU, UNITED HEALTHCARE WORKERSWEST LI 12 N F D IS T IC T O R C STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR CONDUCTING MEDIATION; AND PROPOSED ORDER Case No. 3:16-cv-01644-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?