Barbara v. HERE North America, LLC

Filing 63

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 62 for Dismissal With Prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/6/18. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 NA’IL BENJAMIN, ESQ. (SBN: 240354) BENJAMIN LAW GROUP, P.C. 1290 B Street Suite 314 Hayward, CA 94541 Telephone: 510-897-9967 Facsimile: 510-439-2632 nbenjamin@benjaminlawgroup.com 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff LAMAR BARBARA 7 8 9 10 JUSTIN T. CURLEY, ESQ. (SBN 233287) SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP 560 Mission Street, Suite 3100 San Francisco CA 94105 Telephone: 415-397-2823 Facsimile: 415-397-8549 jcurley@seyfarth.com 11 12 Attorneys for Defendant HERE NORTH AMERICA, LLC 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 LAMAR BARBARA Case No.: 3:16-cv-01650-RS 17 Plaintiff, 18 vs. JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 19 20 21 HERE NORTH AMERICA, LLC, a Limited Liability Company; and DOES 1-50, Defendants. 22 Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg Complaint Filed: February 19, 2016 23 24 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, through their 25 designated counsel, that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice 26 pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1) in its entirety, as the matter has settled and the Parties have executed 27 a Confidential Settlement Agreement and Release. 28 /// JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01650-RS 1 Dated: August 3, 2018 BENJAMIN LAW GROUP, P.C. 2 /s/ Na’il Benjamin NA’IL BENJAMIN Attorney for Plaintiff Lamar Barbara 3 4 5 6 Dated: August ___, 2018 SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP 7 /s/ Justin T. Curley JUSTIN T. CURLEY Attorneys for Defendant HERE NORTH AMERICA, LLC 8 9 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 DATED: _______________ 8/6/18 ____________________________________ HONORABLE, RICHARD SEEBORG 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01650-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?