Green v. California State University East Bay et al

Filing 17

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 16 Stipulation Dismissing Case.(rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2016)

1
2
3
4

W. GORDON KAUPP, SBN 226141
KAUPP & FEINBERG, LLP
870 Market Street, Suite 646
San Francisco, California 94102
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SHARON GREEN
RYAN P. ESKIN, SBN 205413
THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY
OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL
401 Golden Shore, 4th Floor
Long Beach, CA 90802-4210
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY,
SUSAN OPP, DENISE NEEDLAMAN, AND JAMES HOUPIS

14
15
16

---o0o---

17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19

---o0o---

20

SHARON GREEN,

21
22
23
24
25
26

Case No. 16-cv-1655
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE

Plaintiff,
vs.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA
STATE UNIVERSITY; SUSAN OPP, individually;
JAMES HOUPIS, individually; DENISE
NEEDLEMAN, individually; and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive;
Defendants.

27
28
1
STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL
Sharon Green v. Board of Trustees of The California State University

1
2
3
4
5
6

WHEREAS the parties to this action, and each of them, have fully and finally resolved all issues
set forth in this case.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties that this
entire action is hereby dismissed with prejudice. The parties STIPULATE that each party shall bear their
own attorneys’ fees and costs.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

7
8

DATED: July 19, 2016

9

Respectfully submitted,
KAUPP & FEINBERG, LLP

10
By:
11
12
13

DATED: July 19, 2016

/s/_______________
W. Gordon Kaupp
Attorneys for Plaintiff

Respectfully submitted,

14
THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY
15
By:

16
17

/s/______________
Ryan Eskin
Attorneys for Defendants

18
19
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3)
20
I, W. Gordon Kaupp, attest that concurrence in the filing of this stipulation has been obtained
21
from the signatory Ryan Eskin, Defendants’ counsel.
22
Executed this 19 day of July, 2016, in San Francisco, California.
23
By:
/s/
W. Gordon Kaupp

24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL
Sharon Green v. Board of Trustees of The California State University

1
2
3
4

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the Court ORDERS that the foregoing stipulation is
binding, and this case, in its entirety, is dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

DATE: ___________________
July 19, 2016

_______________________________

7

HON. MARIA-ELENA JAMES
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL
Sharon Green v. Board of Trustees of The California State University