United States v. VA Partners I, LLC et al

Filing 30

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO INCREASE PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION by Hon. William Alsup granting in part and denying in part 29 Administrative Motion to extend page limits.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2016)

1BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
1
2
3
4
5

&

C A L I F O R N I A

S C H I L L E R
B O I E S ,

7
8
9
10
11
12
O A K L A N D ,

F L E X N E R

L L P

6

13

David Boies (admitted pro hac vice)
Edward J. Normand (admitted pro hac vice)
333 Main Street
Armonk, NY 10504
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Andrew Z. Michaelson (admitted pro hac vice)
575 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Beko O. Reblitz-Richardson (CA Bar No. 238027)
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

14
Attorneys for Defendants
15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

20
21

Plaintiff,
-against-

22
23
24
25

Case No. 16-cv-01672 (WHA)

VA PARTNERS I, LLC,
VALUEACT CAPITAL MASTER FUND,
L.P., and VALUEACT CO-INVEST
INTERNATIONAL, L.P.,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO INCREASE PAGE LIMITS
FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS AND PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION

Defendants.

26
27
28

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER

STIPULATION

1
1
2
3

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s May 27, 2016 order, Defendants shall file a motion
to dismiss by July 6, 2016, Plaintiff shall file an opposition by August 5, 2016, and Defendants
shall file a reply by August 15, 2016;

4
5
6

&

C A L I F O R N I A

S C H I L L E R
B O I E S ,

8

O A K L A N D ,

F L E X N E R

L L P

7

9
10

WHEREAS, pursuant to Northern District of California Local Civil Rules 7-2, 7-3, and
7-4, Defendants are limited to 25 pages for their notice and supporting papers and Plaintiff is
limited to 25 pages for its memorandum in opposition to Defendants’ motion;
WHEREAS, Defendants’ motion to dismiss will raise complex issues of constitutional
law arising under the First and Fifth Amendments;
WHEREAS, Defendants believe that increasing the page limits will assist the Court in

11
adjudicating this matter and Plaintiff; and
12
13

WHEREAS, Plaintiff does not believe that there are grounds for dismissal or that an

14

enlarged page limit is necessary for Defendants to present their argument, but has agreed not to

15

oppose the Defendants’ motion to facilitate prompt resolution of this matter,

16
17
18

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for
Plaintiff and Defendants that
35

1.

Defendants may submit a motion to dismiss of up to 40 pages;

2.

Plaintiff may submit an opposition brief of up to 40 pages; and

3.

Defendants may submit a reply brief of up to 15 pages.

19

35

20
21
22
23

Nothing herein shall change or otherwise affect any dates currently set per the Court’s
May 27, 2016 order (Docket No. 28).

24
Dated: June 30, 2016

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP

25
26
27
28

By: /s/ Andrew Z. Michaelson
Andrew Z. Michaelson (admitted pro hac vice)
575 Lexington Avenue
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER

1
1
2
3
4
5

&

C A L I F O R N I A

S C H I L L E R
B O I E S ,

7
8
9
10
11

David Boies (admitted pro hac vice)
Edward J. Normand (admitted pro hac vice)
333 Main Street
Armonk, NY 10504
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Beko O. Reblitz-Richardson (CA Bar No. 238027)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

12
O A K L A N D ,

F L E X N E R

L L P

6

New York, NY 10022
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Attorneys for Defendants
By: /s/ Kathleen S. O’Neill
Kathleen S. O’Neill
Brian E. Hanna
Joseph C. Mazumdar
Robert A. Lepore
United States Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
450 5th Street SE
Washington, DC 20530
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Tai S. Milder
United States Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
450 Golden Gate Avenue
Box 36046, Room 10-0101
San Francisco, CA 94102-3478
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Email: [e-mail]

1
1

Attorneys for Plaintiff

2
ATTESTATION

3
4
5

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.
By: /s/ Andrew Z. Michaelson
Andrew Z. Michaelson (admitted pro hac vice)
575 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

&

C A L I F O R N I A

S C H I L L E R
B O I E S ,

7
8
9
10
11

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

12
O A K L A N D ,

F L E X N E R

L L P

6

13
14

June 30, 2016.
Dated:______________

By: ______________________________________
Hon. William Alsup
United States District Judge
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER

3