United States v. VA Partners I, LLC et al

Filing 36

***CORRECTED*** STIPULATION AND ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Alsup on 7/1/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2016)

1BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
1
2
3
4
5

&

C A L I F O R N I A

S C H I L L E R
B O I E S ,

7

O A K L A N D ,

F L E X N E R

L L P

6

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

David Boies (admitted pro hac vice)
Edward J. Normand (admitted pro hac vice)
333 Main Street
Armonk, NY 10504
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Andrew Z. Michaelson (admitted pro hac vice)
575 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Beko O. Reblitz-Richardson (CA Bar No. 238027)
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants

16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

20
21
22
23
24
25

Plaintiff,

Case No. 16-cv-01672 (WHA)

-againstVA PARTNERS I, LLC,
VALUEACT CAPITAL MASTER FUND,
L.P., and VALUEACT CO-INVEST
INTERNATIONAL, L.P.,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO
COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO
DISMISS BRIEFING

Defendants.

26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO
COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING

STIPULATION

1
1
2
3

WHEREAS, Defendants currently must answer or move to dismiss the complaint by July
6, 2016, Plaintiff must file an opposition to any motion to dismiss by August 5, 2016, and
Defendants must file a reply to any such opposition by August 15, 2016;

4
5
6

&

C A L I F O R N I A

S C H I L L E R
B O I E S ,

8

O A K L A N D ,

F L E X N E R

L L P

7

9
10
11
12
13
14

WHEREAS, the parties are in active and productive discussions regarding a resolution of
this matter, such discussions are expected to continue through the weekend, and the parties agree
that the proposed extension of time will facilitate these discussions;
WHEREAS, the Court previously granted the parties’ stipulated request for an order
changing time on May 27, 2016;
WHEREAS, the proposed extension of time will not affect any other dates currently
scheduled by the Court;
THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, the parties through their respective attorneys
stipulate as follows:

15

1.

Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by July 13, 2016;

16

2.

If Defendants move to dismiss the complaint, Plaintiff shall file its opposition to

17
18

Defendants’ motion to dismiss by August 12, 2016; and
3.

Defendants shall file their reply brief, if any, by August 22, 2016.

19
20

Dated: July 1, 2016

21
22
23
24
25

By: /s/ Beko O. Reblitz-Richardson
Beko O. Reblitz-Richardson (CA Bar No. 238027)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorney for Defendants

26
27
28

Dated: July 1, 2016

By: /s/ Kathleen S. O’Neill

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO
COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING

Kathleen S. O’Neill
United States Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
450 5th Street SE
Washington, DC 20530
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

1
1
2
3
4

Attorney for Plaintiff

5

F L E X N E R
&

C A L I F O R N I A

S C H I L L E R

O A K L A N D ,

B O I E S ,

ATTESTATION

7

L L P

6

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this

8

document has been obtained from Kathleen O’Neill, attorney for Plaintiff.

9

By: /s/ Beko O. Reblitz-Richardson
Beko O. Reblitz-Richardson (CA Bar No. 238027)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18

July 1, 2016.
DATED: ___________________

_________________________
Hon. William Alsup
United States District Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO
COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING

2
2