Smith et al v. Antioch Unified School District et al
Filing
99
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING PRODUCTION OF ESI BY AUSD. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/18/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2017)
1
2
3
4
PETER W. ALFERT, SBN 83139
IAN A. HANSEN, SBN 255449
LAW OFFICES OF PETER ALFERT
200 Pringle Ave., Suite 450
Walnut Creek, California 94596
Telephone: (925) 279-3009
Facsimile: (925) 279-3342
peter@alfertlaw.com
5
6
7
8
9
TODD BOLEY, SBN 68119
JUSTIN YOUNG, SBN 267315
LAW OFFICES OF TODD BOLEY
2381 Mariner Square Drive, Suite 280
Alameda, CA 94501
Telephone: (510) 8\36-4500
Facsimile: (510) 649-5170
boley@boleylaw.com
10
Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
16
MICHELE SMITH and M.M., a minor by and
through his guardian ad litem MICHELLE
SMITH
Plaintiffs,
v.
17
18
Case No. 16-cv-01676
JOINT STIPULATION AND
ORDER RE PRODUCTION OF
ELECTRONICALLY STORED
INFORMATION BY ANTIOCH
UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,
TOBINWORLD, SARA FORGHANI,
ANDREW ALTES and DOES 1-30,
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiffs Michele Smith and M.M., a minor by and through his guardian ad litem
AUSD” hereby
)
MICHELE SMITH and Defendant ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (“
jointly move this Court for an order concerning the production of ESI in this case and have reached
the following stipulations and request an order thereon.
1. Defendant AUSD shall make its best efforts to complete its search and production of
responsive ESI to plaintiffs by June 30, 2017. Defendants shall search all available servers,
as well as any archiving or journaling systems for documents which include any of the key
word search terms on Exhibit A.
1
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION BY AUSD
16-CV-01676
1
2. Defendant’ search and production will include deleted emails to the extent they are
s
2
recoverable.
3
3. Defendant will begin producing responsive ESI on or before May 19, 2017 and will make
4
its best efforts to complete production of ESI to plaintiffs by June 30, 2017.
5
4. After production by AUSD, plaintiffs will give notice to AUSD of any document(s) they
6
seek to have un-redacted and, if defendant agrees that the redacted name and/or information
7
is relevant or is likely to lead to the discovery of relevant and admissible evidence,
8
defendant will, within five days of plaintiff’ notice, send out the notice to parent(s)
s
9
attached hereto as Exhibit B, as required by FERPA as to any educational records.
10
5. If no objection is received from the parent in response to defendants notice within 14 days,
11
Defendant AUSD will produce all such redacted documents identified by plaintiffs in native
12
format without redaction.
13
6. If an objection is received, AUSD will provide plaintiffs with a redacted copy of the
14
objection and plaintiffs may file a motion to compel production of the redacted records.
15
7. If AUSD does not agree that an unredacted copy of any document requested by plaintiffs’
16
counsel should be provided, the parties will meet and confer in an effort to resolve the
17
dispute. If the parties cannot resolve the dispute, it may be brought before the randomly
assigned Magistrate Judge accordance with the discovery order.
19
Date: May 17, 2017
LAW OFFICES OF PETER ALFERT, APC
20
21
/s/ Peter Alfert
PETER W. ALFERT
Attorney for Plaintiffs
22
23
Date: May 17, 2017
CHAPMAN & INTRIERI, LLP
24
25
26
27
28
/s/ Jessica Fakihimi
MARK INTRIERI
JESSICA FAKHIMI
Attorneys for Defendant
ANTIOCH UNFIIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION BY AUSD
16-CV-01676
1
ORDER
2
3
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
6
DATED: 5/18/17
Hon. Judge R. Seeborg
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION BY AUSD
16-CV-01676
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?