Villalta v. Eoir et al

Filing 21

ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS. Signed by Judge Alsup on 7/26/2016. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
SELOMI VILLALTA,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

No. C 16-01741 WHA

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA
PAUPERIS STATUS

14

EOIR, PRINT MAGGARD, USCIS, AND
EMILIA BARDINE

15

Defendants.
/

16
In this closed immigration action, pro se plaintiff appealed an order dismissing the

17
18

action. Our court of appeals referred the matter to this Court for a determination as to whether

19

plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. This order determines that it

20

should not. There are no valid grounds on which an appeal can be based. Consequently, this

21

order certifies that any appeal taken from the order of dismissal and judgment of this action will

22

not be taken in good faith and is therefore frivolous. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A); Ellis v.

23

United States, 356 U.S. 674, 674– 75 (1958); Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091,

24

1092 (9th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status is hereby REVOKED.

25

The

26

Clerk shall notify plaintiff and the Court of Appeals of this order. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(4).

27

IT IS SO ORDERED.

28
Dated: July 25, 2016.

WILLIAM ALSUP