Melissa Changeux v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
Filing
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 22 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Sutter Health filed by Sutter Health, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/19/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2016)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MELISSA CHANGEUX
,
CASE No C 03:16-CV-001794-EMC
Plaintiff(s)
v.
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY and SUTTER HEALTH
,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
"
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
"
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
"
Private ADR (specify process and provider)
o
Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
"
the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered. )
"
other requested deadline:
o
/s/ Lawrence Mann
Date: 08/12/16
Date: 08/12/16
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Linda B. Oliver
NO
Ch
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATErJUDGE en
a d M.
dge Edw
Ju
R NIA
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
LI
RT
FO
UNIT
ED
Date:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
"x IT IS SO ORDERED
" IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
S
Attorney for Defendant
Form ADR-Stip rev. "
-2016
A
H
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order
ER
Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting
C
Private ADR.”
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?