Melissa Changeux v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al

Filing 25

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 22 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Sutter Health filed by Sutter Health, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/19/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2016)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MELISSA CHANGEUX , CASE No C 03:16-CV-001794-EMC Plaintiff(s) v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and SUTTER HEALTH , STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: " Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) " Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) " Private ADR (specify process and provider) o Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: " the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. ) " other requested deadline: o /s/ Lawrence Mann Date: 08/12/16 Date: 08/12/16 Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Linda B. Oliver NO Ch U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATErJUDGE en a d M. dge Edw Ju R NIA DERED O OR IT IS S LI RT FO UNIT ED Date: S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O "x IT IS SO ORDERED " IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: S Attorney for Defendant Form ADR-Stip rev. " -2016 A H Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order ER Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting C Private ADR.” N F D IS T IC T O R

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?