Various, Inc. v. Jedi Technologies, Inc.
ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATIONS, Motions terminated: 12 11 10 . Signed by Judge Alsup on 4/19/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2016)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
JEDI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
ORDER DENYING PRO
HAC VICE APPLICATIONS
No. C 16-01833 WHA
The pro hac vice applications of Attorneys Ralph A. Dengler (Dkt. No. 10), Frank M.
Gasparo (Dkt. No. 11), and Gianna E. Cricco-Lizza (Dkt. No. 12), are DENIED for failing to
comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that “he or she is
an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court of
another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis added). Filling out the
pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only identifies the state of bar
membership — such as “the bar of the State of New York” — is inadequate under the local rule
because it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fees do not need to be paid
again, the applications cannot be processed until corrected forms are submitted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 19, 2016.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?