Long v. ASAP Collection Svc. LLC

Filing 8

ORDER Continuing Initial Case Management Conference to 9/8/2016. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 7/6/2016. (mejlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 JACKSON LONG, Case No. 16-cv-01891-MEJ Plaintiff, 7 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE v. 8 9 ASAP COLLECTION SVC. LLC, Defendant. 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff Jackson Long (“Plaintiff”)’s Ex Parte Request for a 13 continuance of the initial Case Management Conference scheduled for July 14, 2016. Dkt. No. 7. 14 Plaintiff requests the Conference be continued for 90 days. Id. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) and Civil Local Rule 16-10, a Case Management Conference will be held in this case before the Honorable Maria-Elena James on September 8, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102. This conference shall be attended by lead trial counsel for parties who are represented. Parties who are proceeding without counsel must appear personally. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than seven calendar days before the Case Management Conference, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement containing the information in the Standing Order for All Judges in the Northern District of California, available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/mejorders. The Joint Case Management Statement form may be obtained at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. If the statement is e-filed, no chambers copy is required. Plaintiff must serve a copy of this Order on Defendant and by August 11, 2016, file with the Court a related proof of service or a status report as to why Defendant has not been served. 1 Additionally, in the future, all requests or motions to change time must comply with Civil Local 2 Rule 6 and specifically Civil Local Rule 6-3, which requires among other things, a proposed order 3 and a declaration setting forth “with particularity” the reasons for the requested enlargement of 4 time, the efforts to obtain a stipulation to change time, and the substantial harm or prejudice that 5 would occur if the Court did not change the time. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9 10 Dated: July 6, 2016 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?