Michael Thomas Meyer v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
27
STIPULATION AND ORDER 26 IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS THIRD REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/26/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2017)
Case 3:16-cv-01894-RS Document 26 Filed 01/25/17 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
KENNETH J. COLLINS, CSBN 100579
ATTORNEY AT LAW
P. O. BOX 1193
ARCATA, CA 95518
(707) 822-1611 FAX (707) 822-1044
EMAIL: aew1950@yahoo.com
4
5
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
EUREKA DIVISION
11
12
MICHAEL THOMAS MEYER,
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
15
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner
of Social Security,
16
Case No.: 3:16-cv-01894-RS
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFF’S THIRD REQUEST
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Defendant
17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned attorneys, subject to the
18
19
approval of the Court, that plaintiff Michael Thomas Meyer may have an extension until February 3,
20
2017 in which to file Plaintiff’s Reply to Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. This is Plaintiff’s
21
third overall request for an extension in this case.
22
Dated: January 25, 2017
23
24
/s/ Kenneth J. Collins
KENNETH J. COLLINS
Attorney for Plaintiff
//
Stipulation and Proposed Order In Support of Plaintiff’s Third Request for Extension of Time
Case No. 3:16-cv-01894-RS
Case 3:16-cv-01894-RS Document 26 Filed 01/25/17 Page 2 of 2
1
BRIAN J. STRETCH
United States Attorney
2
3
SARA WINSOW,
Civil Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
4
5
6
Dated: January 25, 2017
7
8
/s/ Sharon Lahey
Sharon Lahey
Special Assistant United States Attorney
(authorized by email, approved as to
substance)
9
10
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
13
Dated: 1/26/17
Honorable Richard Seeborg
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Stipulation and Proposed Order In Support of Plaintiff’s Third Request for Extension of Time
Case No. 3:16-cv-01894-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?