Michael Thomas Meyer v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Filing 27

STIPULATION AND ORDER 26 IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS THIRD REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/26/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2017)

Download PDF
Case 3:16-cv-01894-RS Document 26 Filed 01/25/17 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 KENNETH J. COLLINS, CSBN 100579 ATTORNEY AT LAW P. O. BOX 1193 ARCATA, CA 95518 (707) 822-1611 FAX (707) 822-1044 EMAIL: aew1950@yahoo.com 4 5 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EUREKA DIVISION 11 12 MICHAEL THOMAS MEYER, Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 15 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 16 Case No.: 3:16-cv-01894-RS STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S THIRD REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Defendant 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned attorneys, subject to the 18 19 approval of the Court, that plaintiff Michael Thomas Meyer may have an extension until February 3, 20 2017 in which to file Plaintiff’s Reply to Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. This is Plaintiff’s 21 third overall request for an extension in this case. 22 Dated: January 25, 2017 23 24 /s/ Kenneth J. Collins KENNETH J. COLLINS Attorney for Plaintiff // Stipulation and Proposed Order In Support of Plaintiff’s Third Request for Extension of Time Case No. 3:16-cv-01894-RS Case 3:16-cv-01894-RS Document 26 Filed 01/25/17 Page 2 of 2 1 BRIAN J. STRETCH United States Attorney 2 3 SARA WINSOW, Civil Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 4 5 6 Dated: January 25, 2017 7 8 /s/ Sharon Lahey Sharon Lahey Special Assistant United States Attorney (authorized by email, approved as to substance) 9 10 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 Dated: 1/26/17 Honorable Richard Seeborg 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Stipulation and Proposed Order In Support of Plaintiff’s Third Request for Extension of Time Case No. 3:16-cv-01894-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?