Stetson University, Inc.-v-Frederick Acker et al

Filing 41

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESCINDING MEDIATION REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE SALLIE KIM AND REFERRAL TO USDC ADR PROGRAM FOR MEDIATION by Hon. William Alsup granting 39 Stipulation selecting Mediation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Lynde Selden III (SBN 207513) lselden@keeginharrison.com Robert L. Harrison (SBN 76710) rharrison@keeginharrison.com KEEGIN HARRISON LLP 1000 Fourth Street, Suite 600 San Rafael, California 94901 Telephone: (415) 456-4000 Facsimile: (415) 456-9021 Attorneys for Plaintiff Stetson University, Inc. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STETSON UNIVERSITY, INC., a Florida not for profit corporation, Plaintiff, v. FREDERICK G. ACKER, as personal representative of the Estate of C. Paul Johnson a/k/a Chauncey Paul Johnson; THE C. PAUL JOHNSON FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION, an entity of unknown form; and FREDERICK G. ACKER, as Trustee of the C. Paul Johnson 2003 Trust, CASE NO. C 16-1905-WHA STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCINDING MEDIATION REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE SALLIE KIM AND REFERRAL TO USDC ADR PROGRAM FOR MEDIATION Judge: Hon. William Alsup 18 19 Defendants, __________________________________ 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCINDING MEDIATION REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE SALLIE KIM AND REFERRAL TO USDC ADR PROGRAM FOR MEDIATION CASE NO. C 16-1905-WHA 1 2 3 WHEREAS the Complaint in the action captioned Stetson University, Inc. v. Frederick G. Acker, et al., No. C 16-1905, was filed in this Court on April 11, 2016; WHEREAS this Court issued a Minute Order on August 25, 2016 referring this 4 matter to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim for mediation but further noted that the parties could file a 5 proposed order to rescind the referral to Judge Kim if they agreed to a mediator; 6 WHEREAS the parties met and conferred and have agreed to four potential 7 mediators participating in the Northern District ADR Program including: U.S. Magistrate Judge 8 Wayne Brazil (ret.); Hon. Rebecca Westerfield (ret.); Richard Collier, Esq; or Paul Renne, Esq. 9 WHEREAS the parties participated in a Telephonic Scheduling Conference with 10 Magistrate Kim on September 8, 2016 at 11 a.m. and indicated a desire to participate in 11 mediation as soon as September 26, 2016 or, more realistically, in early October 2016 before one 12 of the aforementioned agreed-upon mediators; 13 WHEREAS by the Court’s Minute Order of September 8, 2016, Judge Kim 14 agreed to allow the parties to proceed to mediation before one of the agreed-upon court- 15 sponsored ADR program mediators, pending approval of this Court, and ordered the parties to 16 complete mediation by October 23, 2016; 17 WHEREAS Judge Kim further ordered and scheduled a follow-up Telephonic 18 Conference to occur on October 24, 2016 at 9:00 a.m., in the event the parties fail to settle by the 19 October 23, 2016 deadline; 20 WHEREAS the parties contacted the Court’s ADR Program on September 9, 21 2016, indicating the desire to proceed to mediation with one of the four agreed-upon mediators 22 and the Court’s ADR Program staff have informed the parties that they will proceed to assist in 23 scheduling a mediation with one of the four mediators pending an order from this Court referring 24 the matter to the ADR Program. 25 26 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT: 27 28 CASE NO. C 16-1905-WHA 1 1 1. The parties agree to proceed to Mediation before U.S. Magistrate Judge 2 Wayne Brazil (ret.), Hon. Rebecca Westerfield (ret.), Richard Collier, Esq.; or Paul Renne, Esq. 3 no later than October 23, 2016, subject to the assigned mediator’s availability, and 4 2. The parties will attend a Telephonic Conference with Magistrate Judge 5 Sallie Kim on October 24, 2016 at 9 a.m. should the parties fail to settle this matter by the 6 October 23, 2016 deadline. 7 8 Dated: September 13, 2016 Respectfully submitted, KEEGIN HARRISON LLC 9 10 /s/ Lynde Selden III (SBN 207513) lselden@keeginharrison.com Robert L. Harrison (SBN 76710) rharrison@keeginharrison.com 1000 Fourth Street, Suite 600 San Rafael, California 94901 Telephone: (415) 456-4000 Facsimile: (415) 456-9021 Attorneys for Plaintiff Stetson University, Inc. 11 12 13 14 15 16 Dated: September 13, 2016 17 McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP /s/ A. Marisa Chun 275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100 Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: (650) 815-7400 Facsimile: (650) 815-7401 Mchun@mwe.com 18 19 20 21 Attorneys for Defendants Frederick G. Acker, as personal representative of the Estate of C. Paul Johnson a/k/a Chauncey Paul Johnson and Frederick G. Acker, as Trustee for The C. Paul Johnson 2003 Trust 22 23 24 25 /// 26 /// 27 28 CASE NO. C 16-1905-WHA 2 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER The above STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCINDING THE 2 3 REFERRAL FOR MEDIATION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE SALLIE KIM AND ORDER 4 REFERRING THE MATTER TO THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT OF THE NORTHERN 5 DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ADR PROGRAM FOR MEDIATION is APPROVED. 1. 6 7 Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim for mediation; 2. 8 9 The court hereby rescinds the August 25, 2016 referral of this matter to The case is referred to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ADR Program for mediation for assignment to one of the parties’ preferred mediators, 10 namely, U.S. Magistrate Judge Wayne Brazil (ret.), Hon. Rebecca Westerfield (ret.), Richard 11 Collier, Esq, or Paul Renne, Esq., with mediation to be held no later than October 23, 2016, 12 subject to the mediator’s availability; and 3. 13 The parties will appear for a Telephonic Conference with Magistrate 14 Judge Sallie Kim on October 24, 2016 at 9 a.m. should the parties fail to settle this matter by 15 October 23, 2016. If the matter settles, the Parties will immediately inform Judge Kim and this 16 Court. 17 18 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 19, 2016. HONORABLE WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. C 16-1905-WHA 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?