Stapleton v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
19
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 28, 2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
DINA J. STAPLETON,
Plaintiff,
8
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
v.
9
10
Case No. 16-cv-01929-JST
Re: ECF No. 18
Defendant.
12
13
Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in this Social Security appeal was originally due
14
on December 5, 2016. ECF No. 2 (order making Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment due 28
15
days after Defendant’s answer); ECF No. 9 (Defendant’s answer filed). On December 2, 2016, by
16
stipulation of the parties, the Court granted Plaintiff an additional 90 days, to March 4, 2017. ECF
17
No. 13. On February 28, 2017, the Court granted a second extension of time to June 2, 2017, but
18
noted in its order that “the Court does not anticipate granting similar requests for extensions of
19
time in the future.” ECF No. 15. Finally, on June 2, 2017, the Court granted the parties’
20
stipulated request to extend the Plaintiff’s deadline to file her motion for summary judgment to
21
August 31, 2017. ECF No. 18. The Court noted that no further extensions of time would be
22
granted. Id.
As of today’s date, Plaintiff has not filed a motion for summary judgment or otherwise
23
24
addressed her obligations to the Court.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), the district court may dismiss an action
25
26
for failure to comply with any order of the court. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th
27
///
28
///
1
Cir. 1992), as amended (May 22, 1992). In light of Plantiff’s failure to prosecute her case, the
2
Court has no choice but to dismiss the case without prejudice.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 28, 2017
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?