Rhom v. Thumbtack, Inc.

Filing 26

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying 25 Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2016)

Download PDF
1 ANTHONY J. ORSHANSKY, Cal. Bar No.199364 anthony@counselonegroup.com 2 ALEXANDRIA R. KACHADOORIAN, Cal. Bar No. 240601 alexandria@counselonegroup.com 3 JUSTIN KACHADOORIAN, Cal. Bar No. 260356 4 justin@counselonegroup.com COUNSELONE, P.C. 5 9301 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 650 Beverly Hills, California 90210 6 Telephone: (310) 277-9945 Facsimile: (424) 277-3727 7 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHAEL RHOM, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated 9 [Additional parties and counsel on signature 10 page] 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 15 MICHAEL RHOM, on behalf of himself and other similarly situated, 16 Plaintiff, 17 vs. 18 THUMBTACK, INC., a Delaware corporation 19 and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 20 Case No. 3:16-cv-02008-HSG STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Defendant. 21 22 Plaintiff MICHAEL RHOM, and Defendant THUMBTACK, INC., through their 23 respective counsel of record, and without admission of any kind, or waiver of any defense, 24 objection, or other response, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 25 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed his Complaint in the Superior Court of the State of 26 California in and for the County of San Francisco on March 22, 2016; 27 WHEREAS, Plaintiff served Defendant with the Summons and Complaint on April 28 11, 2016; 3:16-cv-02008-HSG STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 WHEREAS, Defendant removed this action to this Court on April 15, 2016; 2 WHEREAS, Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss, Or, in the Alternative, Stay the 3 Complaint (“Motion”) on June 2, 2016; WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed his response in opposition to Defendant’s Motion on 4 5 June 23, 2016; 6 WHEREAS, Defendant filed its reply in support of the Motion on July 7, 2016; 7 WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendant’s Motion is set for August 4, 2016, at 2:00 8 p.m.; 9 WHERAS, the Case Management Conference is currently set for tomorrow, July 10 19, 2016, at 2:00 p.m.; 11 WHEREAS, the parties filed their Joint Case Management Statement on July 12, 12 2016, in compliance with the Court’s Civil Standing Order [see ECF No. 24]; 13 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel on July 18, 2016 contacted Defendant’s counsel 14 and requested a continuance of the Case Management Conference set for July 19, 2016, to August 15 4, 2016, at 2:00 p.m. to coincide with the hearing on the Motion; 16 WHEREAS, Defendant has agreed to Plaintiff’s request; 17 WHEREAS, Local Civil Rule 6-2(a) permits the parties to “file a stipulation, 18 conforming to Civil L.R. 7-12, requesting an order changing time that would affect the date of an 19 event or deadline already fixed by Court order[]”; 20 WHEREAS, a continuance of the Case Management Conference to coincide with 21 the hearing on the Motion serves the interests of judicial economy by minimizing the expenditure 22 of the Court’s and parties’ time and costs, including travel costs; 23 WHEREAS the Court previously granted two time modifications in this case, 24 extending Defendant’s time to respond to the Complaint from May 2, 2016 to June 2, 2016 [ECF 25 No. 11], and extending the parties’ deadline to file a response in opposition to, and reply in 26 support of, the Motion [ECF No. 15]; 27 WHEREAS, granting the requested time modification will not adversely affect the 28 schedule for this case because the parties have already conducted their Rule 26(f) conference [see 3:16-cv-02008-HSG -2STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 ECF No. 24] and ADR phone conference [ECF No. 23] and have begun discovery; 2 NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant, through their counsel of record, 3 stipulate to the following: 4 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that the Case Management Conference currently 5 scheduled for July 19, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. shall be continued to August 4, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. to 6 coincide with the hearing on the Motion. 7 8 DATED: July 18, 2016 9 10 COUNSELONE, PC ANTHONY J. ORSHANSKY ALEXANDRIA R. KACHADOORIAN JUSTIN KACHADOORIAN By: /s/ Anthony J. Orshansky ANTHONY J. ORSHANSKY Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHAEL RHOM 11 12 13 14 DATED: July 18, 2016 15 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP JONATHAN H. BLAVIN ANKUR MANDHANIA 16 By: /s/ Jonathan H. Blavin JONATHAN H. BLAVIN Attorneys for THUMBTACK, INC. 17 18 19 ECF ATTESTATION 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 I, Anthony J. Orshansky, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this document. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the above defense counsel has concurred in and authorized this filing, and I shall maintain records to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the Court if so ordered or for inspection upon request by a party. /s/ Anthony J. Orshansky Anthony J. Orshansky 28 3:16-cv-02008-HSG -3STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER E AT T PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. S 5 ER illiam J r. LI J u d ge d S. G H a y wo o A H 9 RT 8 NO 7 ____________________________________ R NIA ____________________________ D DENIE Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE FO 3 _ 7/19/2016 _______________________ 4 DATE 6 TC RT U O 2 [PROPOSED] ORDERISTRIC SD UNIT ED 1 N D IS T IC T R OF C 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3:16-cv-02008-HSG -4STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?