Siddqui et al v. City of Fremont Community Development Department-Planning Division et al
Filing
19
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause. Response due by 8/1/2016.Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on July 25, 2016. (jsclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ABRAR ELAHI SIDDQUI, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 16-cv-02012-JSC
v.
CITY OF FREMONT, et al.,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:
DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE
Defendants.
12
13
Plaintiffs Abrar Siddqui and Rahila Khan bring this civil action against Defendants the
14
City of Fremont and Leonard Powell as the Community Preservation Manager for City of
15
Fremont. (Dkt. No. 1.) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is now pending before the Court. (Dkt.
16
No. 10.) After Plaintiffs failed to file a response to the motion within the time allotted under
17
Local Rule 7-3, the Court issued an Order directing Plaintiffs to file their opposition or statement
18
of non-opposition by July 21, 2016. Plaintiffs failed to do so.
19
Accordingly, Plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why this action should
20
not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
21
41(b). Plaintiffs shall file a written response to this Order by August 1, 2016. Failure to respond
22
to this Order will result in the dismissal of this action. See Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191
23
F.3d 983, 991 (9th Cir. 1999).
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 25, 2016
26
27
28
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?