Siddqui et al v. City of Fremont Community Development Department-Planning Division et al

Filing 19

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause. Response due by 8/1/2016.Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on July 25, 2016. (jsclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ABRAR ELAHI SIDDQUI, et al., Plaintiffs, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 16-cv-02012-JSC v. CITY OF FREMONT, et al., ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiffs Abrar Siddqui and Rahila Khan bring this civil action against Defendants the 14 City of Fremont and Leonard Powell as the Community Preservation Manager for City of 15 Fremont. (Dkt. No. 1.) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is now pending before the Court. (Dkt. 16 No. 10.) After Plaintiffs failed to file a response to the motion within the time allotted under 17 Local Rule 7-3, the Court issued an Order directing Plaintiffs to file their opposition or statement 18 of non-opposition by July 21, 2016. Plaintiffs failed to do so. 19 Accordingly, Plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why this action should 20 not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21 41(b). Plaintiffs shall file a written response to this Order by August 1, 2016. Failure to respond 22 to this Order will result in the dismissal of this action. See Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 23 F.3d 983, 991 (9th Cir. 1999). 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 25, 2016 26 27 28 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?