Securities and Exchange Commission v. Erik K. Bardman et al
Filing
86
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 85 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference filed by Securities and Exchange Commission Case Management Statement due by 6/5/2018. Further Case Management Conference set for 6/14/2018 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 9, 19th Floor. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 26, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Paul W. Kisslinger
kisslingerp@sec.gov
(202) 551-4427
Kevin C. Lombardi
lombardik@sec.gov
(202) 551-8753
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
100 F Street, NE
Washington, DC 20549
Facsimile: (202) 772-9292
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
v.
Case No. 3:16-cv-02023 (JST)
ERIK K. BARDMAN and
JENNIFER F. WOLF,
Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:16-cv-02023 (JST)
WHEREAS, the Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Enforcement
1
2
(“Division”) and Defendants Erik K. Bardman and Jennifer F. Wolf (“Defendants” and, together
3
with the SEC, the “Parties”) have reached settlement agreements in principle that the Division is
4
currently in the process of submitting to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”)
5
for approval;
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
WHEREAS, currently, the Court has scheduled a Case Management Conference for
May 2, 2018 [Docket Entry 84];
WHEREAS, Plaintiff requests approximately six additional weeks to have the matter
presented to the Commission, and the Defendants consent to such a request;
IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the attorneys
for Plaintiff and the attorneys for Defendants, with the Court’s permission, as follows:
1.
The Case Management Conference scheduled for May 2, 2018 is hereby
continued until June 14, 2018, or at the soonest available time for the Court thereafter.
2.
If the Commission has not approved the terms of the settlement in principle
by June 7, 2018, the Parties shall file a Case Management Statement providing an update on the
progress of settlement.
17
18
Dated: April 25, 2018
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
19
By:
20
21
22
23
24
/s/ Paul W. Kisslinger
Paul W. Kisslinger
Paul W. Kisslinger (New Jersey Bar No. 6511995)
kisslingerp@sec.gov
Kevin C. Lombardi (District of Columbia Bar No. 474114)
lombardik@sec.gov
100 F Street, NE
Washington, DC 20549
Ph: (202) 551-4427
Fax: (202) 772-9772
25
Attorneys for Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
2
CASE NO. 3:16-cv-02023 (JST)
1
Dated: April 25, 2018
SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
2
By:
3
4
/s/ Patrick D. Robbins
Patrick D. Robbins
535 Mission Street, 25th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Ph: (415) 616-1100
Fax: (415) 616-1199
5
6
Attorneys for Defendant Erik K. Bardman
7
8
9
10
Dated: April 25, 2018
KANE+KIMBALL LLP
By:
11
12
13
14
15
/s/ Willam H. Kimball
William H. Kimball
William H. Kimball (State Bar No. 242626)
wkimball@kanekimball.com
803 Hearst Avenue
Berkeley, CA 94710
Ph: (510) 704-1400
Fax: (877) 482-4749
Attorneys for Defendant Jennifer F. Wolf
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
3
CASE NO. 3:16-cv-02023 (JST)
ATTESTATION (CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3))
1
2
3
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing
of this document has been obtained from each signatory.
4
5
Dated: April 25, 2018
6
By:
/s/ Paul W. Kisslinger
Paul W. Kisslinger
7
Attorneys for Securities and Exchange Commission
8
9
* * *
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
14
April 26
Dated: ______________, 2018
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
4
CASE NO. 3:16-cv-02023 (JST)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?