Mahan v. Perez et al

Filing 105

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 104 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 86 MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by Juan Perez. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 6, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2016)

Download PDF
1 4 JENNER & BLOCK LLP Brian Hauck (Cal. Bar No. 303058) bhauck@jenner.com 633 West 5th Street, Suite 3600 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 239-5100 Facsimile: (213) 239-5199 5 Attorneys for Defendant Juan Perez 2 3 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHAUNCEY MAHAN, 12 13 14 15 16 Case No. 3:16-cv-02024-JST Plaintiff, v. The Hon. Jon S. Tigar STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS JUAN PEREZ, et al. Defendant. Hearing Date: November 3, 2016 Time: 2:00 pm. Courtroom: 9 (19th Floor) 17 18 Current Due Date: October 10, 2016 New Due Date: October 14, 2016 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS 1 2 3 STIPULATION WHEREAS: (1) 4 Chauncey Mahan filed his Opposition on October 3, 2016, and Mr. Perez’s reply 5 6 brief is currently due on October 10, 2016; (2) 7 matter, or any other matter, for an indeterminate amount of time; (3) 10 13 14 15 16 After learning of this medical emergency, Mr. Perez’s counsel immediately contacted Mr. Mahan and asked for an extension of time of four days, from 11 12 On October 6, 2016, Mr. Perez’s counsel learned that the primary associate on this matter had a medical emergency that rendered him unable to work on this 8 9 Defendant Juan Perez filed a Motion to Dismiss on September 12, 2016, Plaintiff October 10, 2016 until October 14, 2016, to file his reply brief; (4) Mr. Mahan agreed to Mr. Perez’s requested extension; (5) The agreed-upon extension will not have any effect on the scheduling of the hearing on the motion, which is scheduled for November 3, 2016; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that Defendant Juan Perez’s Reply in support of his Motion to Dismiss shall be due on October 14, 2016. 17 18 (signatures on following page) 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS 1 DATED: October 6, 2016 JENNER & BLOCK LLP 2 3 By: /s/ Brian Hauck Brian Hauck 4 5 Pro Se Plaintiff 6 7 DATED: October 6, 2016 CHAUNCEY MAHAN 8 9 By: 10 11 /s/ Chauncey M. Mahan Chauncey Mahan Pro Se Plaintiff 12 13 PURUSANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 October 6 Dated: ______________, 2016 ____________________________________ The Honorable Jon S. Tigar United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 ATTESTATION 20 I, Brian Hauck, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this 21 Stipulation to Extend Time to File Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss. In compliance with 22 Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 23 obtained from signatory Chauncey Mahan. 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?