Mahan v. Perez et al
Filing
105
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 104 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 86 MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by Juan Perez. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 6, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2016)
1
4
JENNER & BLOCK LLP
Brian Hauck (Cal. Bar No. 303058)
bhauck@jenner.com
633 West 5th Street, Suite 3600
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone:
(213) 239-5100
Facsimile:
(213) 239-5199
5
Attorneys for Defendant Juan Perez
2
3
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHAUNCEY MAHAN,
12
13
14
15
16
Case No. 3:16-cv-02024-JST
Plaintiff,
v.
The Hon. Jon S. Tigar
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
TO DISMISS
JUAN PEREZ, et al.
Defendant.
Hearing Date: November 3, 2016
Time:
2:00 pm.
Courtroom:
9 (19th Floor)
17
18
Current Due Date: October 10, 2016
New Due Date: October 14, 2016
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
STIPULATION
WHEREAS:
(1)
4
Chauncey Mahan filed his Opposition on October 3, 2016, and Mr. Perez’s reply
5
6
brief is currently due on October 10, 2016;
(2)
7
matter, or any other matter, for an indeterminate amount of time;
(3)
10
13
14
15
16
After learning of this medical emergency, Mr. Perez’s counsel immediately
contacted Mr. Mahan and asked for an extension of time of four days, from
11
12
On October 6, 2016, Mr. Perez’s counsel learned that the primary associate on
this matter had a medical emergency that rendered him unable to work on this
8
9
Defendant Juan Perez filed a Motion to Dismiss on September 12, 2016, Plaintiff
October 10, 2016 until October 14, 2016, to file his reply brief;
(4)
Mr. Mahan agreed to Mr. Perez’s requested extension;
(5)
The agreed-upon extension will not have any effect on the scheduling of the
hearing on the motion, which is scheduled for November 3, 2016;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that Defendant Juan Perez’s
Reply in support of his Motion to Dismiss shall be due on October 14, 2016.
17
18
(signatures on following page)
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
1
DATED:
October 6, 2016
JENNER & BLOCK LLP
2
3
By:
/s/ Brian Hauck
Brian Hauck
4
5
Pro Se Plaintiff
6
7
DATED:
October 6, 2016
CHAUNCEY MAHAN
8
9
By:
10
11
/s/ Chauncey M. Mahan
Chauncey Mahan
Pro Se Plaintiff
12
13
PURUSANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
October 6
Dated: ______________, 2016
____________________________________
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge
16
17
18
19
ATTESTATION
20
I, Brian Hauck, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this
21
Stipulation to Extend Time to File Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss. In compliance with
22
Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been
23
obtained from signatory Chauncey Mahan.
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?